Basey v. Cogburn
Don Wayne Basey |
B. Cogburn, R.N., Texas Tech University Medical Center, University of Texas Medical Branch and Karen Gruben, Medical Records Clerk |
22-10047 |
January 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: the court annot withdraw funds from you account. You have to go through the proper channels through the prison to request the withdrawal from you account [22-10047] (MRW) [Entered: 03/07/2022 04:19 PM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Don Wayne Basey [ # 9773220-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 03/30/2022 for Appellant Don Wayne Basey [22-10047] (MRW) [Entered: 02/10/2022 02:00 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Don Wayne Basey to extend time to pay filing fee [9773220-2]. [22-10047] (MRW) [Entered: 02/09/2022 03:50 PM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Don Wayne Basey [ # 9766402-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 02/28/2022 for Appellant Don Wayne Basey [22-10047] (MRW) [Entered: 01/31/2022 03:33 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Don Wayne Basey to extend time to pay filing fee [9766402-2]. [22-10047] (MRW) [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:06 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9757122-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 02/02/2022 for Appellant Don Wayne Basey. [22-10047] (SEP) [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:27 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Don Wayne Basey [22-10047] (LLL) [Entered: 01/14/2022 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.