Miller v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Bobby Miller
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 22-10081
Filed: January 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2022 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Bobby Miller advising the Brief Supporting the motion for a certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Bobby Miller in 22-10081 is incorporated in the motion for a COA [9805124-2]. [22-10081] (MRW) [Entered: 03/23/2022 02:10 PM]
March 22, 2022 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Brief in Support deadline updated to 03/22/2022 for Appellant Bobby Miller [22-10081] (MFY) [Entered: 03/22/2022 11:46 AM]
February 22, 2022 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Bobby Miller for certificate of appealability [9783149-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [22-10081] (MRW) [Entered: 02/23/2022 01:10 PM]
February 22, 2022 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Bobby Miller in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9783149-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9805124-1] [22-10081] (MRW) [Entered: 03/23/2022 02:08 PM]
February 1, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9768101-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-10081] (MVM) [Entered: 02/01/2022 03:19 PM]
January 28, 2022 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9765361-2] NOA filed on 1/24/22 by Appellant Mr. Bobby Miller. [9765361-1] [22-10081] (MVM) [Entered: 01/28/2022 10:51 AM]
January 27, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10081] (CMB) [Entered: 01/27/2022 10:49 AM]
January 26, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9763672-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 03/07/2022 for Appellant Bobby Miller. Brief in Support due on 03/07/2022 for Appellant Bobby Miller [22-10081] (RAJ) [Entered: 01/26/2022 01:49 PM]
January 26, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-388. Electronic ROA due on 02/10/2022. [22-10081] (RAJ) [Entered: 01/26/2022 01:53 PM]
January 24, 2022 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Bobby Miller [22-10081] (LEF) [Entered: 01/24/2022 11:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Miller v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Bobby Miller
Represented By: Bobby Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Nathan Tadema
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?