Mosier v. Lumpkin
| Charles Lee Mosier, Sr. |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 22-10105 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Lee Mosier, Sr. [ # 9807315-2 ] Brief in Support deadline updated to 04/27/2022 for Appellant Charles Lee Mosier Sr. [22-10105] (MRW) [Entered: 03/25/2022 02:19 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Lee Mosier, Sr. to extend time to comply with COA requirements until 04/27/2022 [9807315-2]. [22-10105] (MRW) [Entered: 03/25/2022 02:18 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Lee Mosier, Sr. for leave for Nunc Pro Tunc Correction/ Amendment of his Pro Se Notice of Appeal [9792470-2]. [22-10105] (MRW) [Entered: 03/08/2022 04:03 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Brief in Support due on 03/28/2022 for Appellant Charles Lee Mosier Sr. [22-10105] (MRW) [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:24 PM] |
| Notice of Appeal treated as MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Lee Mosier, Sr. for certificate of appealability [9777015-2]. [22-10105] (MRW) [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:23 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/10/2022 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Charles Lee Mosier, Sr.. [22-10105] (MRW) [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:19 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Charles Lee Mosier, Sr.. Fee deadline satisfied. [22-10105] (CAS) [Entered: 02/10/2022 12:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Katherine Abell for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 22-10105 [22-10105] (CAS) [Entered: 02/10/2022 11:55 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Katherine Abell for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10105] (Katherine Abell ) [Entered: 02/08/2022 01:35 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9771456-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 02/22/2022 for Appellant Charles Lee Mosier Sr. [22-10105] (CAS) [Entered: 02/07/2022 03:13 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Lee Mosier, Sr. [22-10105] (MBC) [Entered: 02/01/2022 01:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mosier v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Charles Lee Mosier, Sr. | |
| Represented By: | Charles Lee Mosier Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Abell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
