Clyce v. Butler
Chance Marcus Clyce, and on behalf of all those similarly situated |
Frederick Farley, Investigator and Supervisor for Hunt County Juvenile Detention Center, individually and in his official capacity, Kenneth Wright, individually and in his official capacity and Shanigia Williams, individually and in her official capacity |
22-10294 |
March 24, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chance Marcus Clyce to extend time to file brief as appellant until 06/08/2022 [9843058-2]. [22-10294] (CBW) [Entered: 05/10/2022 08:22 AM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Chance Marcus Clyce [ # 9843058-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/08/2022 for Appellant Chance Marcus Clyce [22-10294] (CBW) [Entered: 05/10/2022 08:23 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10294] (DDL) [Entered: 03/29/2022 04:29 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 05/09/2022 for Appellant Chance Marcus Clyce. [22-10294] (CBW) [Entered: 03/28/2022 12:19 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9808358-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-10294] (CBW) [Entered: 03/28/2022 12:18 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:15-CV-793. Electronic ROA due on 04/12/2022. [22-10294] (CBW) [Entered: 03/28/2022 12:19 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chance Marcus Clyce [22-10294] (AS) [Entered: 03/24/2022 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Clyce v. Butler | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Chance Marcus Clyce, and on behalf of all those similarly situated | |
Represented By: | Chance Marcus Clyce |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Frederick Farley, Investigator and Supervisor for Hunt County Juvenile Detention Center, individually and in his official capacity | |
Represented By: | Jason Eric Magee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Kenneth Wright, individually and in his official capacity | |
Represented By: | Jason Eric Magee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Shanigia Williams, individually and in her official capacity | |
Represented By: | Jason Eric Magee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.