SW Airlines Pilots Assn v. SW Airlines
| Southwest Airlines Pilots Association |
| Southwest Airlines Company |
| 22-10299 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Railway Labor Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association for filing Appellant's Opening Brief until 06/30/2022 [22-10299] (Colin Patrick Benton ) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:14 PM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association. Extension Granted to and including 06/30/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/30/2022 for Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:18 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10299] (CMB) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:18 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/31/2022 for Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association. [22-10299] (CMB) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jeffrey Wallace Hellberg Jr. for Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association in 22-10299 [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Colin Patrick Benton for party(s) Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association, in case 22-10299 [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:43 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Rusty O'Kane for party(s) Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association, in case 22-10299 [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:45 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William Randell Wilder for Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association in 22-10299 [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:40 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-46. Electronic ROA due on 04/28/2022. [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:32 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Associationfor the Court to process. Date of service: 04/13/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Broderdorf; Attorney for Appellants: Hellberg, Wilder. [22-10299] (Jeffrey Wallace Hellberg Jr.) [Entered: 04/13/2022 09:30 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10299] (Colin Patrick Benton ) [Entered: 04/12/2022 04:06 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jeffrey Wallace Hellberg, Jr. for Southwest Airlines Pilots Association for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10299] (Jeffrey Wallace Hellberg Jr.) [Entered: 04/12/2022 04:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William Randell Wilder for Southwest Airlines Pilots Association for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10299] (William Randell Wilder ) [Entered: 04/12/2022 05:24 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10299] (Rusty O'Kane ) [Entered: 04/12/2022 04:23 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9809539-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 04/13/2022 for Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association [22-10299] (LEF) [Entered: 03/29/2022 11:44 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Southwest Airlines Pilots Association [22-10299] (CAS) [Entered: 03/25/2022 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
