USA v. Casillas
United States of America |
Javier Francisco Casillas |
22-10307 |
March 29, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9810954-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or Motion filed in District Court to Appeal In Forma Pauperis due on 04/14/2022, for Appellant Javier Francisco Casillas. [22-10307] (DLJ) [Entered: 03/30/2022 01:00 PM] |
NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Javier Francisco Casillas [22-10307] (AS) [Entered: 03/29/2022 02:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Casillas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Javier Francisco Casillas | |
Represented By: | Javier Francisco Casillas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.