Claybon v. Gatlin
| Gregory Allen Claybon |
| Thomas Andrew Gatlin, "Drew", District Attorney and Laura Anne Coats, District Attorney |
| 22-10342 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to file appellant's brief and record excerpts [9864198-2] [22-10342] (MFY) [Entered: 06/07/2022 11:58 AM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Zoie Williams. [22-10342] (Zoie Williams ) [Entered: 05/09/2022 02:50 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/31/2022 for Appellant Gregory Allen Claybon. [22-10342] (CMB) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:33 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10342] (CMB) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:32 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:21-CV-1864. Electronic ROA due on 04/28/2022. [22-10342] (MFY) [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:03 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9822893-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-10342] (MFY) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:58 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT'S TRANSFERRED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Gregory Allen Claybon to proceed in forma pauperis [9822903-2]. [22-10342] (MFY) [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:03 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gregory Allen Claybon [22-10342] (CAS) [Entered: 04/11/2022 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
