Comm Wrk of Amer v. Dex Media
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO |
Dex Media, Incorporated, doing business as Thryv, Incorporated |
22-10371 |
April 18, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Labor/Management Relations Act |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO. Extension Granted to and including 07/08/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 07/08/2022 for Appellant Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO [22-10371] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/24/2022 04:15 PM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO for filing Appellant's opening brief until 07/08/2022 [22-10371] (David A. Van Os ) [Entered: 05/24/2022 03:39 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew G. Holder for Appellant Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO in 22-10371 [22-10371] (LLL) [Entered: 05/16/2022 01:35 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David A. Van Os for party(s) Appellant Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, in case 22-10371 [22-10371] (MBC) [Entered: 05/16/2022 03:21 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10371] (Matthew G. Holder ) [Entered: 05/12/2022 03:48 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10371] (David A. Van Os ) [Entered: 05/12/2022 11:24 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Arthur G. Telegen for party(s) Appellee Dex Media, Incorporated, in case 22-10371 [22-10371] (MVM) [Entered: 05/06/2022 03:35 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10371] (Arthur G. Telegen ) [Entered: 05/05/2022 03:50 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10371] (CMB) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:41 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/08/2022 for Appellant Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO. [22-10371] (CMB) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:45 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9828979-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-10371] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:27 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-3295. Electronic ROA due on 05/06/2022. [22-10371] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:33 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO [22-10371] (AS) [Entered: 04/18/2022 12:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Comm Wrk of Amer v. Dex Media | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO | |
Represented By: | Matthew G. Holder |
Represented By: | Rod Tanner |
Represented By: | David A. Van Os |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Dex Media, Incorporated, doing business as Thryv, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Rachel M. Hoffer |
Represented By: | Arthur G. Telegen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.