USA v. Navarro
| United States of America |
| Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro, also known as el Buho |
| 22-10439 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro to extend time to file brief as appellant until 08/12/2022 [9912961-2]. Date of service: 08/10/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Knight; Attorney for Appellee: Simonton [22-10439] (Camille M. Knight ) [Entered: 08/10/2022 02:17 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro [ # 9912961-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 08/12/2022 for Appellant Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro [22-10439] (LEF) [Entered: 08/10/2022 03:50 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro for filing Appellant's Brief until 08/08/2022 [22-10439] (Camille M. Knight ) [Entered: 07/08/2022 10:23 AM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro. Extension Granted to and including 08/10/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 08/10/2022 for Appellant Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro [22-10439] [22-10439] (LEF) [Entered: 07/08/2022 11:12 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10439] (DDL) [Entered: 06/01/2022 03:06 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/11/2022 for Appellant Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro. [22-10439] (DDL) [Entered: 06/01/2022 03:10 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CR-413-8. Electronic ROA due on 06/07/2022. [22-10439] (LEF) [Entered: 05/23/2022 01:28 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Todd Anderson, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 05/11/2022 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [22-10439] (LEF) [Entered: 05/23/2022 01:23 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Deborah A. Kriegshauser, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 05/23/2022 Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled [22-10439] (LEF) [Entered: 05/23/2022 01:21 PM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Todd Anderson. [22-10439] (Todd Anderson ) [Entered: 05/11/2022 04:19 PM] |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Todd Anderson, Est. Completion Dt: 06/10/2022, Est. No.of Pgs: 24, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 05/11/2022, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 06/10/2022, Proceeding Type and Date: Rearraignment 07/13/2021. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 06/10/2022 for Todd Anderson, Court Reporter [22-10439] (LEF) [Entered: 05/11/2022 04:46 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarrofor the Court to process. Date of service: 05/06/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Knight; Attorney for Appellee: Simonton. [22-10439] (Camille M. Knight ) [Entered: 05/06/2022 09:58 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarrofor the Court to process. Date of service: 05/06/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Knight; Attorney for Appellee: Simonton. [22-10439] (Camille M. Knight ) [Entered: 05/06/2022 09:59 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Todd Anderson, Proceeding Type and Date: Rearraignment 07/13/2021 ; Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Deborah A. Kriegshauser, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 04/14/2022. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 05/16/2022 for Todd Anderson, Court Reporter and Deborah Kriegshauser. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9841249-2 ], [ # 9841246-2 ] [22-10439] (LEF) [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:17 AM] |
| CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Ms. Camille M. Knight for Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: NTX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 3:20-CR-413-8 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 8 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 04/26/2022 [22-10439] (MVM) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:39 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 05/17/2022 for Appellant Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro [22-10439] (MVM) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:42 PM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro [22-10439] (MVM) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Navarro | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Ivan Valentin Lomas Navarro, also known as el Buho | |
| Represented By: | Camille M. Knight |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
