First Cash, Inc. v. Sharpe
First Cash, Incorporated, formerly known as First Cash Financial Services, Incorporated |
Chadborne T. Sharpe |
22-10723 |
August 1, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/11/2022 for Appellant Chadborne T. Sharpe. [22-10723] (CMB) [Entered: 08/31/2022 07:47 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10723] (CMB) [Entered: 08/31/2022 07:47 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ericha Ramsey Brown for party(s) Appellee First Cash, Incorporated, in case 22-10723 [22-10723] (MVM) [Entered: 08/29/2022 11:23 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10723] (Ericha Ramsey Brown ) [Entered: 08/26/2022 09:02 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Kim for Appellee First Cash, Incorporated in 22-10723 [22-10723] (MVM) [Entered: 08/26/2022 09:14 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Kim for First Cash, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10723] (Michael Kim ) [Entered: 08/25/2022 06:03 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Joshua David Ross for party(s) Appellant Chadborne T. Sharpe, in case 22-10723 [22-10723] (MVM) [Entered: 08/24/2022 10:11 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10723] (Joshua David Ross ) [Entered: 08/19/2022 05:14 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-1247. Electronic ROA due on 08/30/2022. [22-10723] (MVM) [Entered: 08/15/2022 10:06 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-10723] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellee First Cash, Incorporated and Appellant Mr. Chadborne T. Sharpe is complete and awaiting final payment. [22-10723] (Joshua David Ross ) [Entered: 08/12/2022 04:37 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9907772-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 08/19/2022 for Appellant Chadborne T. Sharpe [22-10723] (CB) [Entered: 08/04/2022 08:43 AM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chadborne T. Sharpe [22-10723] (AS) [Entered: 08/01/2022 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: First Cash, Inc. v. Sharpe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: First Cash, Incorporated, formerly known as First Cash Financial Services, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Michael Kim |
Represented By: | Ericha Ramsey Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Chadborne T. Sharpe | |
Represented By: | Richard L. Pinto |
Represented By: | David K. Speed |
Represented By: | Joshua David Ross |
Represented By: | David Keller Speed |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.