Norman v. Carr
| Alexis C. Norman, and others similarly situated |
| Michael Carr, Warden, FMC Carswell and Charles Langham, Medical Director, FMC Carswell |
| 22-10839 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10839] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2022 10:21 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-669. Electronic ROA due on 10/20/2022. [22-10839] (LEF) [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:33 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 11/14/2022 for Appellant Alexis C. Norman. [22-10839] (LEF) [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:29 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/23/2022 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Ms. Alexis C. Norman. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [22-10839] (LEF) [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:28 PM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Ms. Alexis C. Norman to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [22-10839] (MRW) [Entered: 09/19/2022 03:06 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9928055-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 10/24/2022 for Appellant Alexis C. Norman [22-10839] (CAS) [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:06 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Alexis C. Norman [22-10839] (CBW) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
