Rolex Watch v. Beckertime
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee: Beckertime, L.L.C. and Matthew Becker
Case Number: 22-10866
Filed: September 9, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 26, 2024 Summary Rolex Watch v. Beckertime
March 21, 2024 Summary Rolex Watch v. Beckertime

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2022 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated. Extension Granted to and including 12/23/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 12/23/2022 for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated [22-10866] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/28/2022 09:18 AM]
October 27, 2022 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated for filing Appellant's Brief until 12/23/2022 [22-10866] (Craig Steven Summers ) [Entered: 10/27/2022 07:21 PM]
October 14, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. [22-10866] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2022 01:09 PM]
October 14, 2022 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/23/2022 for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated. [22-10866] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2022 01:15 PM]
October 13, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10866] (DDL) [Entered: 10/13/2022 02:32 PM]
October 6, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andy Nikolopoulos for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Matthew Becker in 22-10866, Attorney Andy Nikolopoulos for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Beckertime, L.L.C. in 22-10866 [22-10866] (PAC) [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:54 AM]
October 5, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10866] (Andy Nikolopoulos ) [Entered: 10/05/2022 09:59 AM]
September 27, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael Beylkin for party(s) Appellee/Cross-Appellant Matthew Becker Appellee/Cross-Appellant Beckertime, L.L.C., in case 22-10866 [22-10866] (PAC) [Entered: 09/27/2022 01:20 PM]
September 27, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-1060. Electronic ROA due on 10/12/2022. [22-10866] (PAC) [Entered: 09/27/2022 12:07 PM]
September 26, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brandon G. Smith for party(s) Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated, in case 22-10866 [22-10866] (RSM) [Entered: 09/26/2022 12:59 PM]
September 26, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew S. Bellinger for party(s) Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated, in case 22-10866 [22-10866] (RSM) [Entered: 09/26/2022 01:06 PM]
September 26, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9946899-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-10866] (MVM) [Entered: 09/26/2022 01:39 PM]
September 26, 2022 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-10866] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 09/26/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants/Cross-Appellees: Bellinger, Brokate, Dupler, Frenchman, Smith, Summers, Szumarska; Attorney for Appellee/Cross-Appellant: Nikolopoulos [22-10866] (Matthew S. Bellinger ) [Entered: 09/26/2022 02:52 PM]
September 26, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Craig Steven Summers for party(s) Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated, in case 22-10866 [22-10866] (RSM) [Entered: 09/26/2022 12:00 PM]
September 23, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10866] (Michael Beylkin ) [Entered: 09/23/2022 05:46 PM]
September 23, 2022 CASE CAPTION updated. Cross appeal filed. [9945803-2] Parties updated: Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated, Appellees/Cross-Appellants Beckertime, L.L.C. and Matthew Becker in 22-10866. NOA filed by Appellees Mr. Matthew Becker and Beckertime, L.L.C.. [9945803-1] [22-10866] (MVM) [Entered: 09/23/2022 12:20 PM]
September 23, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10866] (Matthew S. Bellinger ) [Entered: 09/23/2022 03:05 PM]
September 23, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10866] (Brandon G. Smith ) [Entered: 09/23/2022 03:10 PM]
September 23, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10866] (Craig Steven Summers ) [Entered: 09/23/2022 03:12 PM]
September 22, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Maja Szumarska for party(s) Appellant Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated, in case 22-10866 [22-10866] (MRW) [Entered: 09/22/2022 09:55 AM]
September 22, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeffrey E. Dupler for party(s) Appellant Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated, in case 22-10866 [22-10866] (MRW) [Entered: 09/22/2022 10:07 AM]
September 22, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Beth Michelle Frenchman for party(s) Appellant Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated, in case 22-10866 [22-10866] (MRW) [Entered: 09/22/2022 10:11 AM]
September 22, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Brian William Brokate for Appellant Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated in 22-10866 [22-10866] (MRW) [Entered: 09/22/2022 10:14 AM]
September 21, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Brian William Brokate, Esq. for Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10866] (Brian William Brokate ) [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:18 PM]
September 21, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10866] (Beth Michelle Frenchman ) [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:23 PM]
September 21, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10866] (Jeffrey E. Dupler ) [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:26 PM]
September 21, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-10866] (Maja Szumarska ) [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:28 PM]
September 13, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9938619-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/28/2022 for Appellant Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated [22-10866] (LLL) [Entered: 09/13/2022 12:56 PM]
September 9, 2022 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated [22-10866] (AS) [Entered: 09/09/2022 12:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rolex Watch v. Beckertime
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Rolex Watch USA, Incorporated
Represented By: Brian William Brokate Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Beckertime, L.L.C.
Represented By: Andy Nikolopoulos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Matthew Becker
Represented By: Andy Nikolopoulos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?