USA v. Davis
| United States of America |
| Jim Wesley Davis |
| 22-10868 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:08-CR-36-1. Electronic ROA due on 09/28/2022. [22-10868] (RSM) [Entered: 09/13/2022 03:14 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9938868-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-10868] (RSM) [Entered: 09/13/2022 03:11 PM] |
| NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jim Wesley Davis [22-10868] (CBW) [Entered: 09/12/2022 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Davis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Jim Wesley Davis | |
| Represented By: | Gabriela Vega |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
