SiteLock v. GoDaddy.com
Plaintiff / Appellee: SiteLock, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant: GoDaddy.com, L.L.C.
Case Number: 22-11109
Filed: November 11, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 13, 2023 SiteLock v. GoDaddy.com

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2023 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by GoDaddy.com, L.L.C.. Date of service: 01/09/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Monhait, Schaubert, Sunshine; Attorney for Appellees: Polavarapu, Ryan, Schultz [22-11109] (Jeffrey M. Monhait ) [Entered: 01/09/2023 01:14 PM]
January 9, 2023 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C.. Date of service: 01/09/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Monhait, Schaubert, Sunshine; Attorney for Appellees: Polavarapu, Ryan, Schultz [22-11109] (Jeffrey M. Monhait ) [Entered: 01/09/2023 01:17 PM]
December 19, 2022 COURT ORDER denying Motion to expedite appeal filed by Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C. [ # 9992419-2 ] [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 12/19/2022 04:26 PM]
December 15, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Thomas Graham Schultz for Appellee SiteLock, L.L.C. in 22-11109 [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 12/15/2022 09:52 AM]
December 15, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Aaseesh Polavarapu for party(s) Appellee SiteLock, L.L.C., in case 22-11109 [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 12/15/2022 09:54 AM]
December 14, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-11109] (Aaseesh Polavarapu ) [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:06 PM]
December 14, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Thomas Graham Schultz for SiteLock, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-11109] (Thomas Graham Schultz ) [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:03 PM]
November 30, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-11109] (DDL) [Entered: 11/30/2022 09:45 AM]
November 30, 2022 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/09/2023 for Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C.. [22-11109] (DDL) [Entered: 11/30/2022 09:46 AM]
November 29, 2022 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the additional motion to expedite appeal received from Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C. because it is a duplicate filing. [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 11/30/2022 01:15 PM]
November 29, 2022 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to expedite appeal [ # 9992419-2 ] Date of Service: 11/29/2022 [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 11/30/2022 01:13 PM]
November 29, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Keri Schaubert for party(s) Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C., in case 22-11109 [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 11/29/2022 11:06 AM]
November 29, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David B. Sunshine for party(s) Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C., in case 22-11109 [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 11/29/2022 11:07 AM]
November 29, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jeffrey M. Monhait for Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C. in 22-11109 [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 11/29/2022 11:04 AM]
November 29, 2022 UNOPPOSED MOTION to expedite the appeal [9992419-2]. [22-11109] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED CORRECTED MOTION filed by Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C. to expedite the appeal [9992419-2]. Replaces the motion filed 11/29/2022 Date of Service: 11/29/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Monhait, Schaubert, Sunshine; Attorney for Appellees: Ryan, Schultz; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Schultz [22-11109] (Jeffrey M. Monhait ) [Entered: 11/29/2022 06:34 PM]
November 28, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jeffrey M. Monhait, Esq. for GoDaddy.com, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-11109] (Jeffrey M. Monhait ) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:39 PM]
November 28, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-11109] (Keri Schaubert ) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:46 PM]
November 28, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-11109] (David B. Sunshine ) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:54 PM]
November 17, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:21-MC-42. Electronic ROA due on 12/02/2022. [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 11/17/2022 02:47 PM]
November 17, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9985810-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-11109] (LEF) [Entered: 11/17/2022 02:45 PM]
November 11, 2022 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant GoDaddy.com, L.L.C. [22-11109] (AS) [Entered: 11/11/2022 04:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: SiteLock v. GoDaddy.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: SiteLock, L.L.C.
Represented By: Andrew Baxter Ryan
Represented By: Thomas G. Schultz
Represented By: Thomas Graham Schultz
Represented By: Aaseesh Polavarapu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: GoDaddy.com, L.L.C.
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Monhait Esq.
Represented By: Keri Schaubert
Represented By: David B. Sunshine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?