Dingler v. Garrett
| Joseph Dingler |
| Terry Garrett, Rockwall County Sheriff, NFN McBride, RSO Chief, T. Calkins, RSO Major, NFN Gray, RSO Captain and Rockwall County Court #2 |
| 22-11162 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [12] [22-11162] (MFY) [Entered: 01/19/2023 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 01/04/2023 for Appellant Joseph Dingler [22-11162] (MFY) [Entered: 01/03/2023 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 10 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [10] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-11162] (MFY) [Entered: 12/20/2022 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 6 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [6] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Dingler. [6] [22-11162] (RAJ) [Entered: 12/15/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 12/21/2022 for Appellant Joseph Dingler [22-11162] (MFY) [Entered: 12/06/2022 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Dingler [22-11162] (MVM) [Entered: 11/30/2022 12:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
