Sanchez v. US Immigration Dept
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez |
United States Immigration Department |
22-20078 |
February 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [22-20078] (MRW) [Entered: 04/07/2022 09:32 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez to appoint counsel [9817890-2]. [22-20078] (INCORPORATED IN THE APPELLANT'S BRIEF) (MRW) [Entered: 04/07/2022 09:33 AM] |
EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to appoint counsel [9817890-2] filed by Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez [22-20078] (MRW) [Entered: 04/07/2022 09:34 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez contesting TDCJ and ICE use of a detainer to keep Appellant in custody [9805733-2]. Date of service: 03/12/2022. [22-20078] (DLJ) [Entered: 03/24/2022 09:38 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-20078] (DDL) [Entered: 03/09/2022 10:15 AM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the collection of copies of documents filed in the distict court received from Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez because the purpose of the copies is unclear and they are unnecessary. [22-20078] (DLM) [Entered: 03/14/2022 08:00 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-2537. Electronic ROA due on 03/21/2022. [22-20078] (DLM) [Entered: 03/04/2022 08:48 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 04/13/2022 for Appellant Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez. [22-20078] (DLM) [Entered: 03/04/2022 08:39 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/25/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez. [22-20078] (DLM) [Entered: 03/04/2022 08:36 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez to proceed in forma pauperis [9789445-2] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 02/21/2022 [22-20078] (DLM) [Entered: 03/04/2022 08:38 AM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Transcript Order Form received from Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez because transcripts will not be required in this appeal (advised in briefing notice issued) [22-20078] (DLM) [Entered: 03/04/2022 08:47 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9780078-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 03/07/2022 for Appellant Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez [22-20078] (DMS) [Entered: 02/18/2022 12:29 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez [22-20078] (ABT) [Entered: 02/15/2022 12:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Sanchez v. US Immigration Dept | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez | |
Represented By: | Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: United States Immigration Department | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.