Sorenson v. Agomo
| Michael Sorenson |
| Emelike Agomo, Medical Doctor |
| 22-20108 |
| March 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - False Claims Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9789771-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 03/21/2022 for Appellant Emelike Agomo [22-20108] (ABT) [Entered: 03/04/2022 11:35 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Emelike Agomo [22-20108] (CCR) [Entered: 03/03/2022 01:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sorenson v. Agomo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: Michael Sorenson | |
| Represented By: | James Gregory Rytting |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Emelike Agomo, Medical Doctor | |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Carty Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
