Moore v. Murray
| David Terry Moore |
| Owen Murray, Arnel Chan, Catherine Nwankwo, Bobby Lumpkin and Lannette Linthicum |
| 22-20127 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9842342-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-20127] (ABT) [Entered: 05/09/2022 12:25 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9839127-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore. [9839127-1] [22-20127] (SDH) [Entered: 05/04/2022 08:13 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9840394-2] [UNDER A CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER]. Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 04/28/2022 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs a trust fund statement Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 05/16/2022 for Appellant David Terry Moore [22-20127] (DLM) [Entered: 05/05/2022 09:27 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore to appoint counsel [9840435-2]. Date of service: 04/25/2022 [22-20127] (DLM) [Entered: 05/05/2022 09:49 AM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore referencing Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore in 22-20127 [UNDER A CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER0. [ # 9840394-2 ]. [22-20127] (DLM) [Entered: 05/05/2022 10:23 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's Brief and Request to Process Previous Motions received from Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore because the brief is premature at this time and there are no motions previously received that would need to be processed [22-20127] (DLM) [Entered: 05/05/2022 10:14 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/14/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore. Fee due on 05/05/2022 for Appellant David Terry Moore [22-20127] (ABT) [Entered: 04/20/2022 02:16 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9820184-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-20127] (ABT) [Entered: 04/11/2022 10:54 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9818175-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore. [9818175-1] [22-20127] (RLL) [Entered: 04/07/2022 11:35 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore. [22-20127] (ABT) [Entered: 04/04/2022 08:20 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore to appoint counsel [9817127-2]. Date of service: 03/24/2022 [22-20127] (DLM) [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:31 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motions to Proceed In Forma received from Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore because the request is premature at this time as IFP remains pending before the district court. Once a ruling has been made, notice will be issued accordingly. Also advising that the motion to appoint counsel has been filed and will be considered along with the merits of the appeal once briefing is complete. [22-20127] (DLM) [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:36 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [22-20127] (DLM) [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:47 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9800094-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [22-20127] (DMS) [Entered: 03/17/2022 07:56 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. David Terry Moore [22-20127] (ABT) [Entered: 03/11/2022 12:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
