McIntosh v. Ray
| Richard McIntosh |
| Deputy A. N. Ray, Deputy Bass, Deputy McHugh, Sergeant King, Harris County and Harris County Sheriff's Office |
| 22-20137 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stanley Michael Clark for party(s) Appellee A. N. Ray Appellee Harris County Appellee Deputy Bass Appellee Sergeant King Appellee Harris County Sheriff's Office Appellee Deputy McHugh, in case 22-20137 [22-20137] (SDH) [Entered: 04/26/2022 07:57 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20137] (Stanley Michael Clark ) [Entered: 04/21/2022 01:43 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter[9826456-2] [22-20137] (SDH) [Entered: 04/19/2022 01:35 PM] |
| Attorney Stanley Michael Clark is advised to resubmit appearance form. Reason: The revised Notice of Appearance Form must be used. [22-20137] (LBM) [Entered: 04/04/2022 12:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20137] (Stanley Michael Clark ) [Entered: 04/01/2022 09:48 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9800340-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 04/01/2022 for Appellant Richard McIntosh [22-20137] (DMS) [Entered: 03/17/2022 09:57 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard McIntosh [22-20137] (RLL) [Entered: 03/16/2022 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
