Covington v. City of Madisonville, TX
| Laura Covington |
| City of Madisonville, Texas |
| 22-20311 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Covington v. City of Madisonville, TX |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Ms. Laura Covington [ # 9922549-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 09/22/2022 for Appellant Laura Covington [22-20311] (CCR) [Entered: 08/23/2022 01:30 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Laura Covington to extend time to file brief as appellant until 08/23/2022 [9922549-2]. Date of service: 08/23/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Giles, Helfand; Attorney for Appellant: Watts [22-20311] (Laurence Wade Watts ) [Entered: 08/23/2022 09:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Laurence Wade Watts for Appellant Laura Covington in 22-20311 [22-20311] (ABT) [Entered: 07/27/2022 01:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William S. Helfand for Appellee City of Madisonville, Texas in 22-20311 [22-20311] (NFD) [Entered: 07/26/2022 12:38 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Laurence Wade Watts for Ms. Laura Covington for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20311] (Laurence Wade Watts ) [Entered: 07/26/2022 05:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Norman Ray Giles for party(s) Appellee City of Madisonville, Texas, in case 22-20311 [22-20311] (NFD) [Entered: 07/26/2022 12:36 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William S. Helfand for City of Madisonville, Texas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20311] (William S. Helfand ) [Entered: 07/25/2022 03:01 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-20311] (Norman Ray Giles ) [Entered: 07/25/2022 02:57 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes [22-20311] (CMB) [Entered: 07/14/2022 02:54 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/23/2022 for Appellant Laura Covington. [22-20311] (CMB) [Entered: 07/14/2022 02:54 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9882973-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 07/15/2022 for Appellant Laura Covington [22-20311] (CCR) [Entered: 06/30/2022 02:51 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Laura Covington [22-20311] (CCR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Covington v. City of Madisonville, TX | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Laura Covington | |
| Represented By: | Laurence Wade Watts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: City of Madisonville, Texas | |
| Represented By: | William S. Helfand |
| Represented By: | Norman Ray Giles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
