Berry v. Bank of America
| Anthony Griffin |
| Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Incorporated, Sebring Capital Partners and U.S. Bank National Association |
| Duane L. Berry |
| 22-20379 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notice of 08/11/2022. [22-20379] (CAG) [Entered: 09/13/2022 12:29 PM] |
| IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. [22-20379] (CAG) [Entered: 08/29/2022 12:35 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Returned for Case Management Purposes [9914133-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 08/26/2022 for Appellant Duane L. Berry (signed NOA) [22-20379] (ABT) [Entered: 08/11/2022 03:30 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to correct the record received from Appellant Mr. Duane L. Berry because appellant appears to be attempting to sign the notice of appeal on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Treasury. This appeal is also under jurisdictional review. [22-20379] (CAG) [Entered: 08/05/2022 02:55 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Duane L. Berry. [22-20379] (RLL) [Entered: 07/27/2022 11:56 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Duane L. Berry in 22-20379. Update: Duane L. Berry. [22-20379] (RLL) [Entered: 07/27/2022 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
