Horton v. Allstate Veh and Prop
| Cody Horton |
| Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company |
| 22-20533 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Cody Horton [ # 9982588-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 01/17/2023 for Appellant Cody Horton [22-20533] (ABT) [Entered: 11/16/2022 07:56 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Cody Horton to extend time to file brief as appellant until 01/17/2023 [9982588-2]. Date of service: 11/14/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Bender, Wilson; Attorney for Appellees: Egeland, Harrell, Inman [22-20533] (Andrew Bender ) [Entered: 11/14/2022 02:24 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for extension of briefing deadlines received from Appellee Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company because filing cannot be made on behalf of another party and extension cannot be requested on a projected deadline. [22-20533] (RLL) [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:55 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-20533] (DDL) [Entered: 11/01/2022 08:39 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/12/2022 for Appellant Cody Horton. [22-20533] (DDL) [Entered: 11/01/2022 08:40 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-3109. Electronic ROA due on 11/10/2022. [22-20533] (SDH) [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:10 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-20533] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Cody Horton advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 10/26/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Bender, Wilson; Attorney for Appellees: Egeland, Harrell, Inman [22-20533] (Andrew Bender ) [Entered: 10/26/2022 12:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Daniel Alexander Harrell, Susan Elizabeth Egeland for party(s) Appellee Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, in case 22-20533, by Attorney Sara Elizabeth Inman for Appellee Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company in 22-20533 [22-20533] (SDH) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Sara Elizabeth Inman for Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-20533] (Sara Elizabeth Inman ) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20533] (Daniel Alexander Harrell ) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-20533] (Susan Elizabeth Egeland ) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Andrew Bender for party(s) Appellant Cody Horton, in case 22-20533 [22-20533] (SDH) [Entered: 10/14/2022 02:48 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9960200-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 10/28/2022 for Appellant Cody Horton [22-20533] (SDH) [Entered: 10/13/2022 09:59 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20533] (Andrew Bender ) [Entered: 10/13/2022 03:40 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Cody Horton. [22-20533] (RLL) [Entered: 10/12/2022 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
