Calderon v. Hutto
| Agustin Calderon |
| Assistant Warden T. Hutto, Captain Austin, Jeffrey Richardson, Senior Warden, Mental Health Doctor Ortiz, Major Bobby Rigsby and Caleb Brumley |
| 22-20582 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Agustin Calderon [ # 10005101-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/02/2023 for Appellant Agustin Calderon [22-20582] (DLM) [Entered: 12/16/2022 04:18 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Agustin Calderon to extend time to file brief as appellant until 02/02/2023 [10005101-2]. Date of service: 12/11/2022 [22-20582] (DLM) [Entered: 12/16/2022 04:16 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-20582] (DDL) [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:22 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/08/2022 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Agustin Calderon. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [22-20582] (CCR) [Entered: 11/23/2022 10:36 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 01/03/2023 for Appellant Agustin Calderon. [22-20582] (CCR) [Entered: 11/23/2022 10:37 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-812. Electronic ROA due on 12/08/2022. [22-20582] (CCR) [Entered: 11/23/2022 10:42 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Untitled 11/15/22 document captioned to District Court indicating transcripts are not necessary; Copy of Motion for IFP that was filed in district court; and Letter received from Appellant Mr. Agustin Calderon. The document captioned to the district court advising that transcripts are not needed, should be sent to that court, The purpose of the "Letter" is unclear. To the extent is is an implied appellant's brief, no action will be taken unless he advises that it be filed as such. [22-20582] (DLM) [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Luis Armando Suarez for Appellee Caleb Brumley in 22-20582, Attorney Luis Armando Suarez for Appellee Bobby Rigsby in 22-20582, Attorney Luis Armando Suarez for Appellee Ortiz in 22-20582, Attorney Luis Armando Suarez for Appellee Jeffrey Richardson in 22-20582, Attorney Luis Armando Suarez for Appellee Austin in 22-20582 [22-20582] (ABT) [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:51 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Luis Armando Suarez for NFN Austin, Caleb Brumley, NFN Ortiz, Mr. Jeffrey Richardson and Mr. Bobby Rigsby for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-20582] (Luis Armando Suarez ) [Entered: 11/14/2022 03:37 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9978382-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [22-20582] (CCR) [Entered: 11/07/2022 04:05 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Letter that appears to possibly be a brief on the merits of the appeal received from Appellant Mr. Agustin Calderon because a brief at this time is premature and cannot be filed. When a briefing notice is issued, if he wants the document filed as his brief, a written request to do so will be required. [22-20582] (DLM) [Entered: 11/08/2022 09:30 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Agustin Calderon. [22-20582] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
