Adams v. Lumpkin
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal, Texas D.N.A. Mixture Project, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and United States Supreme Court in Washington D.C.
Case Number: 22-20595
Filed: November 14, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 5, 2023 Adams v. Lumpkin

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2022 Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/28/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Alex Adams because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessment required - BAUGH case. Fee deadline satisfied. [22-20595] (DLM) [Entered: 12/30/2022 04:10 PM]
December 27, 2022 Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Alex Adams in light of the motion being dated 12/14/22, which is before the district court's order of 12/28/22 denying the motion for IFP filed in that court. [22-20595] (DLM) [Entered: 12/30/2022 04:15 PM]
November 17, 2022 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 01/11/2023 for Appellant Alex Adams. [22-20595] (RLL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 04:05 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Alex Adams [22-20595] (ABT) [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adams v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Alex Adams
Represented By: Alex Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Texas D.N.A. Mixture Project
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Supreme Court in Washington D.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?