Copelin v. Hooper
Darrius R. Copelin |
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary |
22-30051 |
January 26, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30051] (MRW) [Entered: 03/24/2022 11:30 AM] |
LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 05/03/2022 for Appellant Darrius R. Copelin. Brief in Support due on 05/03/2022 for Appellant Darrius R. Copelin [22-30051] (MRW) [Entered: 03/24/2022 11:31 AM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Darrius R. Copelin to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: Pending the parties' ongoing negotiation of a postconviction plea agreement, La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 930.10(B), and the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in State v. Reddick.. Date of service: 03/24/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Cohen; Attorney for Appellants: Getz, Wong [22-30051] (Michael Li-Ming Wong ) [Entered: 03/24/2022 03:42 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/28/2021, denying COA for Appellant Mr. Darrius R. Copelin. [22-30051] (DLJ) [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:44 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:18-CV-10970. Electronic ROA due on 04/07/2022. [22-30051] (DLJ) [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:50 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/07/2022 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Darrius R. Copelin. [22-30051] (MCS) [Entered: 03/07/2022 10:37 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matt Aidan Getz for party(s) Appellant Darrius R. Copelin, in case 22-30051 [22-30051] (WMJ) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:22 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Li-Ming Wong for Appellant Darrius R. Copelin in 22-30051 [22-30051] (WMJ) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:03 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Li-Ming Wong for Mr. Darrius R. Copelin for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30051] (Michael Li-Ming Wong ) [Entered: 02/07/2022 07:46 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30051] (Matt Aidan Getz ) [Entered: 02/07/2022 07:48 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for ruling on a COA and ruling on Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed 01/26/2022, document number 52. [9764394-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-30051] (DLJ) [Entered: 01/27/2022 10:43 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Darrius R. Copelin. [22-30051] (DLJ) [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Copelin v. Hooper | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Darrius R. Copelin | |
Represented By: | Michael Li-Ming Wong |
Represented By: | Matt Aidan Getz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary | |
Represented By: | Gershon Benjamin Cohen Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.