Evans v. Dillard University
| Tyniski Evans |
| Dillard University and Walter Kimbrough |
| 22-30079 |
| February 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42, for failure to file appellant's brief and record excerpts [9815370-2]. [22-30079] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/05/2022 08:26 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Darren A. Patin for Appellees Walter Kimbrough and Dillard University in 22-30079. [22-30079] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/28/2022 01:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Darren A. Patin, Esq. for Dillard University and Mr. Walter Kimbrough for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30079] (Darren A. Patin ) [Entered: 02/25/2022 09:58 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/30/2022 for Appellant Tyniski Evans. [22-30079] (CMB) [Entered: 02/18/2022 02:45 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30079] (CMB) [Entered: 02/18/2022 02:44 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9779912-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-30079] (AGL) [Entered: 02/18/2022 10:48 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-2076. Electronic ROA due on 03/07/2022. [22-30079] (AGL) [Entered: 02/18/2022 11:00 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Tyniski Evans [22-30079] (AGL) [Entered: 02/15/2022 01:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
