OnPath Fed Crdt Un v. US Dept of Trea
| OnPath Federal Credit Union |
| United States Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund |
| 22-30080 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutes |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 OnPath Fed Crdt Un v. US Dept of Trea
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union for filing Appellant's Brief until 05/18/2022 [22-30080] (George Robert Parrott II) [Entered: 04/05/2022 02:55 PM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union. Extension Granted to and including 05/18/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 05/18/2022 for Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union [22-30080] (AGL) [Entered: 04/05/2022 03:00 PM] |
| COURT ORDER granting joint motion to view and obtain sealed document filed by Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union and Appellee United States Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund [ # 9799424-2 ] [22-30080] (AGL) [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:53 AM] |
| JOINT MOTION filed by Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union and Appellee United States Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund to view and obtain sealed documents. Date of service: 03/16/2022 [22-30080] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union to view and obtain sealed document. Date of service: 03/16/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Boitmann, Copes, Mansfield; Attorney for Appellants: Buffington, Parrott [22-30080] (George Robert Parrott II) [Entered: 03/16/2022 12:21 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to supplement the record with sealed documents received from Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union because it is unnecessary, as the sealed documents listed in the motion are included in the electronic record on appeal and are accessible to this court. However, in order for counsel to obtain access to them, a motion to view and obtain sealed documents must be filed with this court. [22-30080] (AGL) [Entered: 03/15/2022 02:10 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30080] (CMB) [Entered: 03/09/2022 11:02 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/18/2022 for Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union. [22-30080] (CMB) [Entered: 03/09/2022 11:03 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes (no hearings). Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-30080] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 03/07/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Boitmann, Copes, Mansfield; Attorney for Appellants: Buffington, Parrott [22-30080] (George Robert Parrott II) [Entered: 03/07/2022 03:02 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:20-CV-1367. Electronic ROA due on 03/22/2022. [22-30080] (AGL) [Entered: 03/07/2022 03:21 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney George Robert Parrott II for Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union in 22-30080 [22-30080] (CB) [Entered: 03/04/2022 04:08 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Charles Phillip Buffington Jr. for party(s) Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union, in case 22-30080 [22-30080] (CB) [Entered: 03/04/2022 01:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30080] (Charles Phillip Buffington Jr.) [Entered: 03/03/2022 11:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. George Robert Parrott, II for OnPath Federal Credit Union for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30080] (George Robert Parrott II) [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Peter M. Mansfield for Appellee United States Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund in 22-30080 [22-30080] (AGL) [Entered: 02/23/2022 04:21 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kevin G. Boitmann for party(s) Appellee United States Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, in case 22-30080 [22-30080] (AGL) [Entered: 02/23/2022 04:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Diane Hollenshead Copes for party(s) Appellee United States Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, in case 22-30080 [22-30080] (AGL) [Entered: 02/23/2022 04:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Peter M. Mansfield for United States Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30080] (Peter M. Mansfield ) [Entered: 02/22/2022 02:47 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30080] (Kevin G. Boitmann ) [Entered: 02/22/2022 02:48 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30080] (Diane Hollenshead Copes ) [Entered: 02/22/2022 02:49 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9780577-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 03/08/2022, for Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union. [22-30080] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/21/2022 08:05 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant OnPath Federal Credit Union. [22-30080] (DLJ) [Entered: 02/16/2022 10:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
