Day v. Aeroframe Services
Bruce Day |
Aeroframe Services, L.L.C. |
Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated |
22-30190 |
April 13, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Day v. Aeroframe Services |
Day v. Aeroframe Services |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING SUSPENDED - A clerk order was entered in 22-30288 granting motion of Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated to consolidate cases 22-30185, 22-30186, 22-30187, 22-30188, 22-30189, 22-30190, 22-30191, 22-30192, 22-30193, 22-30194, 22-30196, 22-30198, 22-30201, 22-30209 with 22-30288. Also, granting request to designate case 22-30288 as the lead case. A/Pet's Brief deadline canceled [22-30185, 22-30186, 22-30187, 22-30188, 22-30189, 22-30190, 22-30191, 22-30192, 22-30193, 22-30194, 22-30196, 22-30198, 22-30201, 22-30209] (MCS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 11:32 AM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Bruce Day in 22-30190. Update: Order entered in 22-30288 consolidating cases 22-30185, 22-30186, 22-30187, 22-30187, 22-30188, 22-30189, 22-30190, 22-30191 22-30192, 22-30193, 22-30194, 22-30196, 22-30198, 22-30201, 22-30209 with 22-30288.. [22-30190] (MCS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:19 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/18/2022 for Appellant Aeroframe Services, L.L.C.. [22-30288, 22-30185, 22-30186, 22-30187, 22-30188, 22-30189, 22-30190, 22-30191, 22-30192, 22-30193, 22-30194, 22-30196, 22-30198, 22-30201, 22-30209] (MCS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:21 PM] |
CLERK ORDER granting motion to consolidate case 22-30288 with 22-30185, 22-30186, 22-30187, 22-30188, 22-30189, 22-30190, 22-30191, 22-30192, 22-30193, 22-30194, 22-30196, 22-30198, 22-30201, 22-30209 filed by Appellee Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated [ # 9855742-2 ] in 22-30288; granting motion to designate 22-30288 as the lead case filed by Appellee Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated [ # 9855742-3 ] in 22-30288. [22-30288, 22-30185, 22-30186, 22-30187, 22-30188, 22-30189, 22-30190, 22-30191, 22-30192, 22-30193, 22-30194, 22-30196, 22-30198, 22-30201, 22-30209] (MCS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 10:46 AM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to consolidate cases filed by Appellant Aeroframe Services, L.L.C. [ # 9849225-2 ] in 22-30185 [22-30185, 22-30186, 22-30187, 22-30188, 22-30189, 22-30190, 22-30191, 22-30192, 22-30193, 22-30194, 22-30196, 22-30198, 22-30201, 22-30209] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/19/2022 02:07 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30190] (DDL) [Entered: 05/12/2022 03:02 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/21/2022 for Appellants Aeroframe Services, L.L.C. and Bruce Day. [22-30190] (DDL) [Entered: 05/12/2022 03:11 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Patrick Vance for Appellee Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated in 22-30190 [22-30190] (CB) [Entered: 05/04/2022 09:34 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Virginia Weichert Gundlach for party(s) Appellee Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated, in case 22-30190 [22-30190] (CB) [Entered: 05/04/2022 09:36 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Samuel Bryan Gabb for party(s) Appellee Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated, in case 22-30190 [22-30190] (MAS) [Entered: 05/04/2022 03:42 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30190] (Samuel Bryan Gabb ) [Entered: 05/03/2022 05:49 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brett S. Venn for party(s) Appellee Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated, in case 22-30190. [22-30190] (SEP) [Entered: 05/03/2022 04:28 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30190] (Virginia Weichert Gundlach ) [Entered: 05/03/2022 02:18 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30190] (Brett S. Venn ) [Entered: 05/03/2022 12:43 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Robert Patrick Vance, Esq. for Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30190] (Robert Patrick Vance ) [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:25 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Lawrence Charles Billeaud for Aeroframe Services, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30190] (Lawrence Charles Billeaud ) [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:13 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Somer George Brown for Appellant Bruce Day in 22-30190 [22-30190] (CB) [Entered: 04/27/2022 07:33 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Lawrence Charles Billeaud for Appellant Aeroframe Services, L.L.C. in 22-30190. [22-30190] (SEP) [Entered: 04/28/2022 03:16 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mrs. Somer George Brown for Mr. Bruce Day for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30190] (Somer Brown ) [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:26 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9829062-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-30190] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:59 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:16-CV-1512. Electronic ROA due on 05/06/2022. [22-30190] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/21/2022 04:02 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Bruce Day, Aeroframe Services, L.L.C. and Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated in 22-30190. Update: Additional appeal to be filed. [22-30190] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/18/2022 11:49 AM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9824998-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Bruce Day. [9824998-1] [22-30190] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/18/2022 11:51 AM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Aeroframe Services, L.L.C. [22-30190] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/14/2022 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.