Plimsoll Marine v. City of Gretna
| Plimsoll Marine, Incorporated, Owners of the M/V Okaloosa for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability |
| Empire Stevedoring, Incorporated and Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans |
| City of Gretna |
| 22-30295 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other personal property damage |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Plimsoll Marine v. City of Gretna |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:19-CV-14757. Electronic ROA due on 08/01/2022. [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 07/15/2022 03:41 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Toni Doyle Tusa, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 07/15/2022. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled. [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 07/15/2022 03:40 PM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Toni Doyle Tusa. [22-30295] (Toni Doyle Tusa ) [Entered: 06/13/2022 09:45 AM] |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIVED of Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Toni Doyle Tusa, Est. Completion Dt: 07/13/2022, Est. No.of Pgs: 600, Financial Arrangement: pvfd, Financial Arrangement Made: y, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 06/13/2022DIS-1 Remedy deadline satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 07/13/2022 for Toni Doyle Tusa, Court Reporter [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 06/13/2022 08:31 PM] |
| DISMISSAL NOTICE ISSUED for failure to make financial arrangements [9867706-2] DIS-1 Remedy due on 06/27/2022 for Appellant City of Gretna. [22-30295] (CB) [Entered: 06/10/2022 01:13 PM] |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT received for Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled [22-30295] (CB) [Entered: 06/10/2022 01:11 PM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Toni Doyle Tusa. [22-30295] (Toni Doyle Tusa ) [Entered: 06/09/2022 03:36 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Frederick William Swaim, III, Esq. for Plimsoll Marine, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30295] (Frederick William Swaim III) [Entered: 06/03/2022 09:23 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Frederick William Swaim III for Appellee Plimsoll Marine, Incorporated in 22-30295 [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 06/03/2022 10:25 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30295] (Daniel McClelland ) [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Daniel McClelland for party(s) Appellee Plimsoll Marine, Incorporated, in case 22-30295 [22-30295] (CB) [Entered: 06/03/2022 01:47 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Guy for party(s) Appellee Empire Stevedoring, Incorporated Appellee Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, in case 22-30295 [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 06/02/2022 10:07 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Erica Sensenbrenner for party(s) Appellee Empire Stevedoring, Incorporated Appellee Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, in case 22-30295 [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 06/02/2022 10:03 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30295] (Matthew Guy ) [Entered: 06/01/2022 04:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Christopher J. Kane, Esq. for Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans and Empire Stevedoring, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30295] (Christopher J. Kane ) [Entered: 06/01/2022 10:13 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30295] (Matthew Guy ) [Entered: 06/01/2022 09:23 AM] |
| Attorney Christopher J. Kane is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: No signature on appearance form. [22-30295] (BF) [Entered: 06/01/2022 03:35 PM] |
| for Matthew C. Guy is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: No signature on appearance form. [22-30295] (BF) [Entered: 06/01/2022 03:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30295] (Erica Sensenbrenner ) [Entered: 06/01/2022 04:10 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant City of Gretnafor the Court to process. Date of service: 05/31/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Kane, Swaim; Attorney for Appellants: Riess, Tschirn. [22-30295] (Robert Tschirn ) [Entered: 05/31/2022 08:59 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant City of Gretna. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Toni Doyle Tusa, Proceeding Type and Date: Bench Trial 03/09/2022 - 03/11/2022. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 06/10/2022 for Toni Tusa, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9858008-2 ] [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 05/31/2022 10:19 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Robert Tschirn for party(s) Appellant City of Gretna, in case 22-30295 [22-30295] (AGL) [Entered: 05/27/2022 04:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Robert Carson Riess for Appellant City of Gretna in 22-30295 [22-30295] (CB) [Entered: 05/26/2022 08:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30295] (Robert Tschirn ) [Entered: 05/26/2022 10:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Robert Carson Riess, Esq. for City of Gretna for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30295] (Michael Robert Carson Riess ) [Entered: 05/24/2022 02:19 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9853083-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 06/07/2022 for Appellant City of Gretna [22-30295] (CB) [Entered: 05/23/2022 11:32 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant City of Gretna [22-30295] (MCS) [Entered: 05/18/2022 12:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
