De La Rosa v. King
| Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa |
| Elaine K. King and Owners Insurance Company, improperly named Auto-Owners Insurance Company |
| 22-30367 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Motor Vehicle |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as the record citations in the Table of Contents are improperly formatted. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0. Record Excerpts deadline satisfied. Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 08/18/2022, for Appellant Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa. [22-30367] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa. Date of service: 08/03/2022, via email - Attorney for Appellants: Daigre, Mondino; Attorney for Appellees: Lemann, Pontier. [22-30367] (Robert Joseph Daigre ) [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:19 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 (PAPER COPIES NOT REQUESTED AT THIS TIME). A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 08/17/2022, for Appellant Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa. Appellees' Brief due on 09/01/2022, for Appellees Elaine K. King and Owners Insurance Company. [22-30367] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa. Date of service: 08/02/2022, via email - Attorney for Appellees: Lemann, Pontier. [22-30367] (Robert Joseph Daigre ) [Entered: 08/02/2022 05:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Joseph Daigre for Appellant Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa, in case 22-30367. [22-30367] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/07/2022 03:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30367] (Robert Joseph Daigre ) [Entered: 07/06/2022 12:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Claire Easterling Pontier for Appellees Owners Insurance Company and Elaine K. King in 22-30367. [22-30367] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/01/2022 01:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jonathan Percy Lemann for Appellees Owners Insurance Company and Elaine K. King in 22-30367. [22-30367] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/01/2022 01:06 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jonathan Percy Lemann for Ms. Elaine K. King and Owners Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30367] (Jonathan Percy Lemann ) [Entered: 06/30/2022 04:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Claire Easterling Pontier for Ms. Elaine K. King and Owners Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30367] (Claire Easterling Pontier ) [Entered: 06/30/2022 04:27 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30367] (CMB) [Entered: 06/23/2022 01:08 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/02/2022 for Appellant Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa. [22-30367] (CMB) [Entered: 06/23/2022 01:09 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9874715-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-30367] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/21/2022 12:58 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-164. Electronic ROA due on 07/06/2022. [22-30367] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/21/2022 01:01 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Hugo Sanchez De La Rosa. [22-30367] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/17/2022 01:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
