Kimble v. Correcthealth Jefferson
Raymond Harold Kimble, III |
Correcthealth Jefferson, L.L.C. |
22-30451 |
July 27, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9904455-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 09/26/2022 for Appellant Raymond Harold Kimble III. [22-30451] (SEP) [Entered: 08/01/2022 09:47 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Harold Kimble, III. [22-30451] (SEP) [Entered: 07/27/2022 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Kimble v. Correcthealth Jefferson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Raymond Harold Kimble, III | |
Represented By: | Raymond Harold Kimble III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Correcthealth Jefferson, L.L.C. | |
Represented By: | Emma Madison Barton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.