Calogero v. Shows, Cali & Walsh
Plaintiff / Appellant: Iris Calogero, On her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Margie Nell Randolph, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Shows, Cali & Walsh, L.L.P., a Louisiana limited liability partnership, Mary Catherine Cali and John C. Walsh
Case Number: 22-30487
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 15, 2024 Summary Calogero v. Shows, Cali & Walsh

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30487] (Clara Potter ) [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:05 PM]
September 16, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30487] (Jamie Bj Rush ) [Entered: 09/16/2022 01:39 PM]
September 16, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jamie Bj Rush for party(s) Appellant Iris Calogero, Appellant Margie Nell Randolph, in case 22-30487. [22-30487] (SEP) [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:49 PM]
September 16, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30487] (Kirsten Anderson ) [Entered: 09/16/2022 01:47 PM]
September 16, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kirsten Anderson for party(s) Appellant Iris Calogero, Appellant Margie Nell Randolph, in case 22-30487. [22-30487] (SEP) [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:52 PM]
September 16, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Clara Potter for party(s) Appellant Iris Calogero, Appellant Margie Nell Randolph, in case 22-30487. [22-30487] (SEP) [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:55 PM]
September 13, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Keren E. Gesund for Ms. Iris Calogero and Ms. Margie Nell Randolph for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30487] (Keren E. Gesund ) [Entered: 09/13/2022 11:53 AM]
September 13, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Keren E. Gesund for Appellants Margie Nell Randolph and Iris Calogero in 22-30487. [22-30487] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/13/2022 12:42 PM]
September 13, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David Scranton Daly for Appellees John C. Walsh, Mary Catherine Cali, and Shows, Cali & Walsh, L.L.P. in 22-30487. [22-30487] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/13/2022 04:18 PM]
September 13, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. David Scranton Daly, Esq. for Ms. Mary Catherine Cali, Shows, Cali & Walsh, L.L.P. and Mr. John C. Walsh for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30487] (David Scranton Daly ) [Entered: 09/13/2022 03:57 PM]
September 12, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Margaret E. Woodward for Appellants Margie Nell Randolph and Iris Calogero in 22-30487. [22-30487] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/12/2022 04:12 PM]
September 12, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30487] (Margaret E. Woodward ) [Entered: 09/12/2022 03:23 PM]
September 12, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jennifer C. Deasy for Appellants Margie Nell Randolph andt Iris Calogero in 22-30487. [22-30487] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/12/2022 08:38 AM]
September 12, 2022 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Ms. Iris Calogero and Ms. Margie Nell Randolph. Extension Granted to and including 11/16/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/16/2022, for Appellants Iris Calogero and Margie Nell Randolph. [22-30487] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/12/2022 02:51 PM]
September 9, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30487] (Jennifer C. Deasy ) [Entered: 09/09/2022 12:32 PM]
September 7, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30487] (DDL) [Entered: 09/07/2022 03:58 PM]
September 7, 2022 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/17/2022 for Appellants Iris Calogero and Margie Nell Randolph. [22-30487] (DDL) [Entered: 09/07/2022 03:59 PM]
September 6, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:18-CV-6709. Electronic ROA due on 09/21/2022. [22-30487] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/06/2022 12:13 PM]
September 6, 2022 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. [22-30487] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Iris Calogero and Ms. Margie Nell Randolph advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 09/06/2022, via email - Attorney for Appellee: Daly; Attorney for Appellants: Deasy, Gesund, Woodward. [22-30487] (Margaret E. Woodward ) [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:39 AM]
August 12, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9914844-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 08/29/2022 for Appellants Iris Calogero and Margie Nell Randolph [22-30487] (MCS) [Entered: 08/12/2022 12:15 PM]
August 10, 2022 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Iris Calogero and Ms. Margie Nell Randolph [22-30487] (MCS) [Entered: 08/10/2022 04:19 PM]
August 10, 2022 CASE CAPTION updated. Appellant Margie Nell Randolph added to case. Reason: It was inadvertently not added at case opening. [22-30487] (MCS) [Entered: 08/10/2022 04:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Calogero v. Shows, Cali & Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Iris Calogero, On her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Jennifer C. Deasy
Represented By: Keren E. Gesund
Represented By: Margaret E. Woodward
Represented By: Kirsten Anderson
Represented By: Clara Potter
Represented By: Jamie Bj Rush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Margie Nell Randolph, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Jennifer C. Deasy
Represented By: Keren E. Gesund
Represented By: Margaret E. Woodward
Represented By: Kirsten Anderson
Represented By: Clara Potter
Represented By: Jamie Bj Rush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Shows, Cali & Walsh, L.L.P., a Louisiana limited liability partnership
Represented By: David Scranton Daly Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Mary Catherine Cali
Represented By: David Scranton Daly Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John C. Walsh
Represented By: David Scranton Daly Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?