USA v. Williams
| United States of America |
| Darius Williams, also known as D-Nice Williams |
| 22-30491 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Attorney Townsend Myers added as counsel of record for Appellant Darius Williams in 22-30491 [22-30491] (AGL) [Entered: 08/11/2022 02:41 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [22-30491] Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is pending in District Court. (AGL) [Entered: 08/11/2022 02:35 PM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Darius Williams [22-30491] (AGL) [Entered: 08/11/2022 02:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Michael Eston Trummel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Darius Williams, also known as D-Nice Williams | |
| Represented By: | Townsend MacMartin Myers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
