Jack v. Evonik Corporation
Ervin Jack, Jr. |
Evonik Corporation, successor in interest to Evonik Materials Corporation and Tomah Reserve Incorporated, formerly known as Air Products Performance Manufacturing, Incorporated, formerly known as Versum Materials Performance Manufacturing, Incorporat and Shell Oil Company |
22-30526 |
August 17, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Personal Liability |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. [ # 9958982-2 ] Date of service: 10/13/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barousse, Naquin, Thornton; Attorney for Appellees: Best, Cerise, Harrison, Polk, Richardson, Sensenbrenner, Vandenweghe, Weiner [22-30526] (Brandon Naquin ) [Entered: 10/13/2022 04:12 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to file corrected record excerpts received from Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. because a motion is not required. You must electronically file your Proposed Sufficient Record Excerpts by selecting from the Briefs category the event, Proposed Sufficient Record Excerpts, via the electronic filing system. [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 10/13/2022 03:47 PM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to file record excerpts in excess pages filed by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. [ # 9958999-2 ]. The clerk is granting your unopposed motion for the Court subject to possible reconsideration by the merits panel at a later date. [22-30526] (SEP) [Entered: 10/12/2022 02:55 PM] |
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 11/10/2022 for Appellees Evonik Corporation and Shell Oil Company [22-30526] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr.. Date of service: 10/11/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barousse, Naquin, Thornton; Attorney for Appellees: Best, Cerise, Harrison, Polk, Richardson, Sensenbrenner, Vandenweghe, Weiner [22-30526] (Jennifer L. Thornton ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 05:15 PM] |
SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [22-30526] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require tabs are required and certificate of service is not listed in the table of contents. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 10/26/2022 for Appellee Evonik Corporation [22-30526] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr.. Date of service: 10/11/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barousse, Naquin, Thornton; Attorney for Appellees: Best, Cerise, Harrison, Polk, Richardson, Sensenbrenner, Vandenweghe, Weiner [22-30526] (Jennifer L. Thornton ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 05:17 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION to file record excerpts in excess pages [9958999-2]. Date of service: 10/11/2022 [22-30526] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. to file record excerpts in excess pages [9958999-2]. Date of service: 10/11/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barousse, Naquin, Thornton; Attorney for Appellees: Best, Cerise, Harrison, Polk, Richardson, Sensenbrenner, Vandenweghe, Weiner [22-30526] (Jennifer L. Thornton ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 06:13 PM] |
SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. [22-30526] (DDL) [Entered: 09/30/2022 03:50 PM] |
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr.. Extension Granted to and including 10/11/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/11/2022 for Appellant Ervin Jack Jr. [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 09/27/2022 08:26 AM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to supplement the record on appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. [ # 9947189-2 ] [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 09/27/2022 10:23 AM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. for filing Plaintiff-Appellant's Initial Brief until 10/11/2022 [22-30526] (Brandon Naquin ) [Entered: 09/26/2022 04:51 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION to supplement the record on appeal with Documents 1 through 55 predating the severance of Mr. Jack's case from the original action in which Mr. Jack was a co-plaintiff, captioned Lamar Ellis, et al. v. Evonik Corporation, et al., EDLA Civil Action No. 21-1089. [9947189-2]. Date of service: 09/26/2022 [22-30526] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. to supplement the record on appeal with Documents 1 through 55 predating the severance of Mr. Jack's case from the original action in which Mr. Jack was a co-plaintiff, captioned Lamar Ellis, et al. v. Evonik Corporation, et al., EDLA Civil Action No. 21-1089. [9947189-2]. Date of service: 09/26/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barousse, Naquin, Thornton; Attorney for Appellees: Best, Cerise, Harrison, Polk, Richardson, Sensenbrenner, Vandenweghe, Weiner [22-30526] (Brandon Naquin ) [Entered: 09/26/2022 06:11 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (William Andrus Barousse ) [Entered: 09/01/2022 12:05 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Brandon Naquin for Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Brandon Naquin ) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:34 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Jennifer L. Thornton for Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30526] (Jennifer L. Thornton ) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:32 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Erica Sensenbrenner ) [Entered: 09/01/2022 12:40 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Erica Sensenbrenner for party(s) Appellee Evonik Corporation, in case 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 09/01/2022 04:47 PM] |
Amended APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jennifer L. Thornton for Appellant Ervin Jack Jr. in 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 09/01/2022 04:57 PM] |
AMENDED APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Brandon Naquin for Appellant Ervin Jack Jr. in 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 09/01/2022 04:56 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Andrus Barousse for party(s) Appellant Ervin Jack Jr., in case 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 09/01/2022 04:50 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Roland Manil Vandenweghe Jr. for Appellee Evonik Corporation in 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 08/31/2022 10:28 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Roland Manil Vandenweghe, Jr. for Evonik Corporation for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Roland Manil Vandenweghe Jr.) [Entered: 08/30/2022 05:06 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Janika D. Polk for party(s) Appellee Shell Oil Company, in case 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:48 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Janika D. Polk ) [Entered: 08/26/2022 09:26 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Monique M. Weiner for Appellee Shell Oil Company in 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:23 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mark Edward Best for party(s) Appellee Shell Oil Company, in case 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:25 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Charles Adam Cerise Jr. for party(s) Appellee Evonik Corporation, in case 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:45 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael S. Harrison II for party(s) Appellee Shell Oil Company, in case 22-30526 [22-30526] (MAS) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:43 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Mark Edward Best ) [Entered: 08/25/2022 10:30 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Michael S. Harrison II) [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:17 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mrs. Monique M. Weiner for Shell Oil Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30526] (Monique M. Weiner ) [Entered: 08/25/2022 10:24 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Charles Adam Cerise Jr.) [Entered: 08/25/2022 04:19 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30526] (Brandon Naquin ) [Entered: 08/22/2022 09:30 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Jennifer L. Thornton for Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30526] (Jennifer L. Thornton ) [Entered: 08/22/2022 09:24 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/03/2022 for Appellant Ervin Jack Jr.. [22-30526] (MRW) [Entered: 08/22/2022 11:37 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30526] (MRW) [Entered: 08/22/2022 11:36 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jennifer L. Thornton for Appellant Ervin Jack Jr. in 22-30526. [22-30526] (SEP) [Entered: 08/24/2022 09:57 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brandon Naquin for party(s) Appellant Ervin Jack Jr., in case 22-30526. [22-30526] (SEP) [Entered: 08/24/2022 10:00 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:22-CV-1520. Electronic ROA due on 09/06/2022. [22-30526] (SEP) [Entered: 08/19/2022 03:28 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9920924-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-30526] (SEP) [Entered: 08/19/2022 03:22 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeffrey Edward Richardson for party(s) Appellee Evonik Corporation, in case 22-30526. [22-30526] (SEP) [Entered: 08/24/2022 09:54 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30526] (Jeffrey Edward Richardson ) [Entered: 08/19/2022 04:46 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ervin Jack, Jr. [22-30526] (SEP) [Entered: 08/17/2022 08:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jack v. Evonik Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Ervin Jack, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Jennifer L. Thornton |
Represented By: | William Andrus Barousse |
Represented By: | Brandon Naquin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Evonik Corporation, successor in interest to Evonik Materials Corporation and Tomah Reserve Incorporated, formerly known as Air Products Performance Manufacturing, Incorporated, formerly known as Versum Materials Performance Manufacturing, Incorporat | |
Represented By: | Roland Manil Vandenweghe Jr. |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Edward Richardson |
Represented By: | Charles Adam Cerise Jr. |
Represented By: | Erica Sensenbrenner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Shell Oil Company | |
Represented By: | Monique M. Weiner |
Represented By: | Mark Edward Best Esq. |
Represented By: | Michael S. Harrison II |
Represented By: | Janika D. Polk Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.