State of Missouri v. Biden
| State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty, Martin Kulldorff, Jim Hoft, Jayanta Bhattacharya and Jill Hines |
| Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Jennifer Rene Psaki, Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra, Department of Health & Human Services, Anthony Fauci, National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Alejandro Mayorkas, Department of Homeland Security, Jen Easterly, Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Nina Jankowicz, Karine Jean-Pierre, Carol Crawford, Jennifer Shopkorn, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Robert Silvers, Samantha Vinograd and Gina McCarthy |
| Mike Webb, Major |
| 22-30531 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to file appellant's brief [22] [22-30531] (WMJ) [Entered: 11/15/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Elizabeth Baker Murrill for Appellee State of Louisiana in 22-30531 [22-30531] (CB) [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Elizabeth Baker Murrill, Esq. for Mr. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Ms. Jill Hines, Mr. Jim Hoft, Mr. Aaron Kheriaty, Mr. Martin Kulldorff, State of Louisiana and State of Missouri for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30531] (Elizabeth Baker Murrill ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 01:41 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/09/2022 for Appellant Mike Webb. [22-30531] (DDL) [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:00 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30531] (DDL) [Entered: 09/30/2022 09:59 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/13/2022 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Mike Webb. [22-30531] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/14/2022 03:14 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-1213. Electronic ROA due on 09/29/2022. [22-30531] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/14/2022 03:14 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motions to proceed in forma pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Mike Webb because Appellant's motion is currently pending in the District Court. [22-30531] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/13/2022 11:01 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Mike Webb. Fee deadline satisfied. [22-30531] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/13/2022 10:39 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to proceed in forma pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Mike Webb because it is a duplicate of the form received on 08/19/2022, to which you were instructed to file said motion with the District Court. [22-30531] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/23/2022 08:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Daniel Winik for party(s) Appellee Department of Homeland Security Appellee National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases Appellee Gina McCarthy Appellee U.S. Census Bureau Appellee Jennifer Shopkorn Appellee Karine Jean-Pierre Appellee Carol Crawford Appellee Samantha Vinograd Appellee Xavier Becerra Appellee U.S. Department of Commerce Appellee Jen Easterly Appellee Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency Appellee Robert Silvers Appellee Department of Health & Human Services Appellee Centers for Disease Control & Prevention Appellee Anthony Fauci Appellee Alejandro Mayorkas Appellee Nina Jankowicz Appellee Joseph R. Biden Jr. Appellee Vivek H. Murthy, in case 22-30531 [22-30531] (MRW) [Entered: 08/19/2022 08:39 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process (main and two additional appeals). [9920260-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 09/06/2022 for Appellant Mike Webb [22-30531] (AGL) [Entered: 08/19/2022 09:50 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the application to proceed in forma pauperis and informal brief received from Appellant Mr. Mike Webb. A motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must first be filed with the District Court. If that court denies the motion, appellant may then request that relief from this court. Additionally, the brief is premature as we have not yet issued a briefing notice in this case. [22-30531] (AGL) [Entered: 08/19/2022 02:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30531] (Daniel Winik ) [Entered: 08/18/2022 11:00 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9918596-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Mike Webb. [9918596-1] [22-30531] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:02 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9918610-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Mike Webb. [9918610-1] [22-30531] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:08 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Mike Webb. [22-30531] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/17/2022 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
