Cox v. Louisiana State
| Albert Cox |
| Louisiana State and Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary |
| 22-30650 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Albert Cox for certificate of appealability [9972488-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [22-30650] (MRW) [Entered: 10/31/2022 08:54 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Albert Cox in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9972488-2 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9972491-1] [22-30650] (MRW) [Entered: 10/31/2022 08:55 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/25/2022 decertifying IFP for Appellant Mr. Albert Cox. Fee due on 12/08/2022 for Appellant Albert Cox [22-30650] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:15 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30650] (CMB) [Entered: 10/18/2022 10:03 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9961607-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 11/23/2022 for Appellant Albert Cox. Brief in Support due on 11/23/2022 for Appellant Albert Cox [22-30650] (CB) [Entered: 10/14/2022 02:27 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-375. Electronic ROA due on 10/31/2022. [22-30650] (CB) [Entered: 10/14/2022 02:34 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Albert Cox [22-30650] (MCS) [Entered: 10/13/2022 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
