Richardson v. Day
Petitioner / Appellant: Eric Richardson
Respondent / Appellee: Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Case Number: 22-30685
Filed: October 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30685] (DDL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 09:52 AM]
November 15, 2022 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/03/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Eric Richardson. [22-30685] (SEP) [Entered: 11/15/2022 11:12 AM]
November 15, 2022 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 12/27/2022 for Appellant Eric Richardson. Brief in Support due on 12/27/2022 for Appellant Eric Richardson. Fee deadline updated to 12/27/2022 for Appellant Eric Richardson. [22-30685] (SEP) [Entered: 11/15/2022 11:12 AM]
November 15, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-2154. Supplemental Electronic ROA due on 11/30/2022. [22-30685] (SEP) [Entered: 11/15/2022 11:15 AM]
November 1, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30685] (DDL) [Entered: 11/01/2022 02:32 PM]
October 28, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-2154. Electronic ROA due on 11/14/2022. [22-30685] (SEP) [Entered: 10/28/2022 04:31 PM]
October 27, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9971070-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 11/14/2022 for Appellant Eric Richardson. [22-30685] (MCS) [Entered: 10/27/2022 02:51 PM]
October 27, 2022 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Richardson for certificate of appealability [9972254-2]. Date of service: 10/23/2022. [22-30685] (SEP) [Entered: 10/28/2022 04:28 PM]
October 27, 2022 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Richardson in support of Motion for certificate of appealability. [ # 9972254-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA). Date of Service: 10/23/2022. [9972256-1] [22-30685] (SEP) [Entered: 10/28/2022 04:29 PM]
October 27, 2022 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Eric Richardson to the District Court for filing. Fee deadline canceled. [22-30685] (SEP) [Entered: 11/01/2022 02:05 PM]
October 25, 2022 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Eric Richardson [22-30685] (MCS) [Entered: 10/25/2022 08:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richardson v. Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Eric Richardson
Represented By: Eric Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Represented By: Juliet Lee Clark Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?