Diamond Services v. Cormier
| Diamond Services Corporation, as Owner of The Diamond 85 |
| Benjamin D. Cormier |
| Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. and Crosby Marine Transportation, L.L.C. |
| 22-30688 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Marine |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. William Neville Gee, III [ # 9988751-2 ]; denying Motion to suspend briefing notice filed by Mr. William Neville Gee, III [ # 9988751-3 ]; granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Mr. William Neville Gee, III [ # 9988751-4 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/10/2023 for Appellant Benjamin D. Cormier [22-30688] (WMJ) [Entered: 11/25/2022 11:41 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Zachary Ardoin for Appellee Crosby Marine Transportation, L.L.C. in 22-30688, by Attorney(s) Zachary Ardoin for party(s) Appellee Crosby Tugs, L.L.C., in case 22-30688 [22-30688] (CAG) [Entered: 11/22/2022 10:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joseph Edward Lee III for Appellee Crosby Marine Transportation, L.L.C. in 22-30688, Attorney Joseph Edward Lee III for Appellee Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. in 22-30688 [22-30688] (CAG) [Entered: 11/22/2022 10:39 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Appellee Crosby Marine Transportation, L.L.C. added to case. Reason: Appellant's counsel confirms they are party to this appeal. Please use the attached caption for all future filings in this case. [22-30688] (CAG) [Entered: 11/22/2022 10:22 AM] |
| MOTION to withdraw as counsel [9988751-2], to suspend briefing notice dated 11/17/2022 [9988751-3], alternatively to extend time to file brief as appellant until 02/10/2023 [9988751-4]. Date of Service: 11/22/2022. [22-30688] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Attorney Mr. William Neville Gee, III for Appellant Mr. Benjamin D. Cormier to withdraw as counsel [9988751-2]. Date of Service: 11/22/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Ardoin, Clements, Gonski, Lee, McIntosh, Reisman, Waid; Attorney for Appellants: Gee, Thornton [22-30688] (William Neville Gee III) [Entered: 11/22/2022 01:21 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Miles Paul Clements for Appellee Crosby Marine Transportation, L.L.C. in 22-30688, by Attorney(s) Miles Paul Clements for party(s) Appellee Crosby Tugs, L.L.C., in case 22-30688 [22-30688] (CAG) [Entered: 11/22/2022 02:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30688] (Miles Paul Clements ) [Entered: 11/21/2022 10:53 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Joseph Edward Lee, III for Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30688] (Joseph Edward Lee III) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30688] (Zachary Ardoin ) [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:40 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30688] (AGL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 12:21 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/27/2022 for Appellant Benjamin D. Cormier. [22-30688] (AGL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 12:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David Latham Reisman for Appellee Diamond Services Corporation in 22-30688 [22-30688] (MCS) [Entered: 11/16/2022 09:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. David Latham Reisman for Diamond Services Corporation for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30688] (David Latham Reisman ) [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:02 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kathryn Zainey Gonski for party(s) Appellee Diamond Services Corporation, in case 22-30688 [22-30688] (MCS) [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Raymond Timothy Waid for party(s) Appellee Diamond Services Corporation, in case 22-30688 [22-30688] (MCS) [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Elizabeth Belle McIntosh for party(s) Appellee Diamond Services Corporation, in case 22-30688 [22-30688] (MCS) [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30688] (Elizabeth Belle McIntosh ) [Entered: 11/11/2022 10:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30688] (Raymond Timothy Waid ) [Entered: 11/11/2022 10:06 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30688] (Kathryn Zainey Gonski ) [Entered: 11/11/2022 10:20 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William Neville Gee III for Appellant Benjamin D. Cormier in 22-30688 [22-30688] (MRW) [Entered: 11/03/2022 09:41 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jennifer L. Thornton for Appellant Benjamin D. Cormier in 22-30688 [22-30688] (MRW) [Entered: 11/03/2022 09:39 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Jennifer L. Thornton for Mr. Benjamin D. Cormier for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30688] (Jennifer L. Thornton ) [Entered: 10/31/2022 02:58 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William Neville Gee, III for Mr. Benjamin D. Cormier for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30688] (William Neville Gee III) [Entered: 10/31/2022 12:34 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9971730-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-30688] (AGL) [Entered: 10/28/2022 11:38 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:20-CV-408. Electronic ROA due on 11/14/2022. [22-30688] (AGL) [Entered: 10/28/2022 11:41 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Benjamin D. Cormier [22-30688] (AGL) [Entered: 10/26/2022 08:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
