Melancon v. Lafayette Gen Med Ctr
| Angela Melancon |
| Lafayette General Medical Center, Incorporated, doing business as Ochsner Lafayette General Medical Center |
| 22-30704 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Melancon v. Lafayette Gen Med Ctr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/17/2023 for Appellant Angela Melancon. [22-30704] (DDL) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:45 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30704] (DDL) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:43 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:21-CV-3752. Electronic ROA due on 12/06/2022. [22-30704] (SEP) [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:27 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Andrew John Halverson for party(s) Appellee Lafayette General Medical Center, Incorporated, in case 22-30704. [22-30704] (SEP) [Entered: 11/23/2022 09:15 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30704] (Andrew John Halverson ) [Entered: 11/21/2022 08:52 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney G. Karl Bernard for Appellant Angela Melancon in 22-30704. [22-30704] (SEP) [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:24 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. G. Karl Bernard, Esq. for Ms. Angela Melancon for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30704] (G. Karl Bernard ) [Entered: 11/18/2022 07:52 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. [22-30704] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Angela Melancon advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 11/18/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Bernard; Attorney for Appellee: Guidry [22-30704] (G. Karl Bernard ) [Entered: 11/18/2022 07:53 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9977268-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 11/21/2022 for Appellant Angela Melancon. [22-30704] (SEP) [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:28 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Angela Melancon. [22-30704] (SEP) [Entered: 11/02/2022 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Melancon v. Lafayette Gen Med Ctr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Angela Melancon | |
| Represented By: | G. Karl Bernard Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Lafayette General Medical Center, Incorporated, doing business as Ochsner Lafayette General Medical Center | |
| Represented By: | Greg Guidry |
| Represented By: | Andrew John Halverson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
