Daigle v. Kijakazi
Walter Daigle |
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
22-30721 |
November 9, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
SSID Title XVI (Social Security) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Walter Daigle. Date of service: 01/06/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Chickering, Kemp; Attorney for Appellant: Mustian [22-30721] (William Roy Mustian III) [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:26 PM] |
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Walter Daigle. Date of service: 01/06/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Chickering, Kemp; Attorney for Appellant: Mustian [22-30721] (William Roy Mustian III) [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:25 PM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Walter Daigle for filing Appellant's Original Brief and Appellee's Original Brief until 01/09/2023 [22-30721] (William Roy Mustian III) [Entered: 12/13/2022 02:42 PM] |
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Walter Daigle. Extension Granted to and including 01/11/2023. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 01/11/2023 for Appellant Walter Daigle [22-30721] (CCR) [Entered: 12/13/2022 03:17 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kerry Kemp for party(s) Appellee Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, in case 22-30721 [22-30721] (CAG) [Entered: 11/21/2022 11:56 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30721] (Kerry Kemp ) [Entered: 11/18/2022 01:40 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William Roy Mustian III for Appellant Walter Daigle in 22-30721 [22-30721] (AGL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 08:33 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William Roy Mustian, III, Esq. for Mr. Walter Daigle for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30721] (William Roy Mustian III) [Entered: 11/16/2022 09:21 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30721] (DDL) [Entered: 11/15/2022 08:46 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/27/2022 for Appellant Walter Daigle. [22-30721] (DDL) [Entered: 11/15/2022 08:46 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9980988-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-30721] (MCS) [Entered: 11/10/2022 12:32 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-764. Electronic ROA due on 11/25/2022. [22-30721] (MCS) [Entered: 11/10/2022 12:35 PM] |
SOCIAL SECURITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Walter Daigle [22-30721] (MCS) [Entered: 11/09/2022 03:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Daigle v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Walter Daigle | |
Represented By: | William Roy Mustian Esq. III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Anne Chickering |
Represented By: | Kerry Kemp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.