Henning Management v. Chevron USA,
| Henning Management, L.L.C. |
| Chevron USA, Incorporated |
| 22-30761 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Torts to Land |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 REPLY filed by Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated [36] to the filed by Appellee Henning Management, L.L.C. [ # 29 ]. Date of Service: 01/24/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bruchhaus, Keating, Marcello; Attorney for Appellants: Gregoire, Grossman, Lamb, Phillips, Stern. [22-30761] (Martin A. Stern ) [Entered: 01/24/2023 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 34 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Patrick Keating for party(s) Appellee Henning Management, L.L.C., in case 22-30761 [22-30761] (PAC) [Entered: 01/19/2023 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 30 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30761] (Matthew Patrick Keating ) [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE/OPPOSITION [29] to the Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated in 22-30761 [ # 25 ] Response/Opposition deadline satisfied. [22-30761] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Henning Management, L.L.C. [29] to the filed by Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated [ # 25 ] Date of Service: 01/17/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bruchhaus, Marcello; Attorney for Appellants: Gregoire, Grossman, Lamb, Phillips, Stern. [22-30761] (Victor L. Marcello ) [Entered: 01/17/2023 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 27 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Victor L. Marcello for party(s) Appellee Henning Management, L.L.C., in case 22-30761. [22-30761] (SEP) [Entered: 01/16/2023 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 26 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Victor L. Marcello, Esq. for Henning Management, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30761] (Victor L. Marcello ) [Entered: 01/16/2023 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 25 OPPOSED MOTION for stay pending appeal [25] Ruling is requested by: 02/06/2023. Response/Opposition due on 01/17/2023. [22-30761] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated for stay pending appeal [25] Ruling is requested by: 02/03/2023. Date of service: 01/05/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bruchhaus, Marcello; Attorney for Appellants: Gregoire, Grossman, Lamb, Phillips, Stern [22-30761] (Martin A. Stern ) [Entered: 01/05/2023 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 24 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/01/2023 for Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated. [22-30761] (DDL) [Entered: 12/23/2022 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 23 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30761] (DDL) [Entered: 12/23/2022 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Alexandra Roselli Lamb for party(s) Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated, in case 22-30761 [22-30761] (MRW) [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 19 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Martin A. Stern for party(s) Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated, in case 22-30761 [22-30761] (MRW) [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Louis Victor Gregoire Jr. for party(s) Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated, in case 22-30761 [22-30761] (MRW) [Entered: 12/09/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30761] (Alexandra Roselli Lamb ) [Entered: 12/09/2022 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30761] (Martin A. Stern ) [Entered: 12/09/2022 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael Raudon Phillips for party(s) Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated, in case 22-30761 [22-30761] (PAC) [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:20-CV-4. Electronic ROA due on 12/23/2022. [22-30761] (PAC) [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-30761] (PAC) [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Louis Matthew Grossman for Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated in 22-30761 [22-30761] (PAC) [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30761] (Louis Victor Gregoire Jr.) [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporatedfor the Court to process. Date of service: 12/08/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bruchhaus, Marcello; Attorney for Appellant: Grossman. [22-30761] (Louis Matthew Grossman ) [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 12/23/2022 for Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated [22-30761] (MRW) [Entered: 12/08/2022 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30761] (Michael Raudon Phillips ) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Louis Matthew Grossman for Chevron USA, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30761] (Louis Matthew Grossman ) [Entered: 12/07/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Chevron USA, Incorporated [22-30761] (MAS) [Entered: 12/01/2022 02:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
