Ceaser v. Hooper
Petitioner / Appellant: Coby Quinton Ceaser
Respondent / Appellee: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Case Number: 22-30778
Filed: December 9, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2023 Filing 15 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser to the District Court for filing. [22-30778] (MRW) [Entered: 02/03/2023 09:29 AM]
February 3, 2023 Filing 14 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser [ # 13 ] [22-30778] (MRW) [Entered: 02/03/2023 09:24 AM]
February 2, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser to reopen case [13] Default Remedied. [22-30778] (MRW) [Entered: 02/03/2023 09:22 AM]
January 23, 2023 Filing 12 The Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser in 22-30778 [ # 8 ] has been made sufficient. [22-30778] (MRW) [Entered: 01/24/2023 08:15 AM]
January 17, 2023 Filing 10 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [10] [22-30778] (AGL) [Entered: 01/17/2023 09:43 AM]
January 11, 2023 Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 8 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA). Document is insufficient for the following reason(s):need signature. [9] [22-30778] (MRW) [Entered: 01/13/2023 07:58 AM]
January 11, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser for certificate of appealability [8]. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: need signature Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 01/23/2023 for Appellant Coby Quinton Ceaser [22-30778] (MRW) [Entered: 01/13/2023 07:55 AM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 7 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 01/11/2023 for Appellant Coby Quinton Ceaser [22-30778] (MAS) [Entered: 01/04/2023 12:46 PM]
December 12, 2022 Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP due on 12/27/2022 for Appellant Coby Quinton Ceaser. [22-30778] (MCS) [Entered: 12/12/2022 10:27 AM]
December 12, 2022 Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/12/2022 denying COA for Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser [22-30778] (MCS) [Entered: 12/12/2022 10:15 AM]
December 9, 2022 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Coby Quinton Ceaser [22-30778] (WMJ) [Entered: 12/09/2022 12:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ceaser v. Hooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Coby Quinton Ceaser
Represented By: Coby Quinton Ceaser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Represented By: David Stephen Pipes Esq. Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?