Soudelier v. Ofc of the Secy of State
| Jacques L. Soudelier |
| Office of the Secretary of State, Louisiana and R. Kyle Ardoin, Secretary of State, Individually |
| 22-30809 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Voting (Civil Rights) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Soudelier v. Ofc of the Secy of State |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/13/2023 for Appellant Jacques L. Soudelier. [22-30809] (DDL) [Entered: 01/30/2023 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 22 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-30809] (DDL) [Entered: 01/30/2023 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 21 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:22-CV-2436. Electronic ROA due on 02/10/2023. [22-30809] (WMJ) [Entered: 01/26/2023 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 20 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Jacques L. Soudelier. Fee deadline satisfied [22-30809] (WMJ) [Entered: 01/26/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 18 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Cassie Holt for party(s) Appellee R. Kyle Ardoin Appellee Office of the Secretary of State, Louisiana, in case 22-30809 [22-30809] (PAC) [Entered: 01/19/2023 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30809] (Cassie Holt ) [Entered: 01/18/2023 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Carroll Walsh for Appellee R. Kyle Ardoin in 22-30809, Attorney John Carroll Walsh for Appellee Office of the Secretary of State, Louisiana in 22-30809 [22-30809] (CAG) [Entered: 01/16/2023 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Alyssa Riggins for party(s) Appellee R. Kyle Ardoin Appellee Office of the Secretary of State, Louisiana, in case 22-30809 [22-30809] (CAG) [Entered: 01/16/2023 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Thomas A. Farr for party(s) Appellee R. Kyle Ardoin Appellee Office of the Secretary of State, Louisiana, in case 22-30809 [22-30809] (CAG) [Entered: 01/16/2023 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Phillip Strach for party(s) Appellee R. Kyle Ardoin Appellee Office of the Secretary of State, Louisiana, in case 22-30809 [22-30809] (CAG) [Entered: 01/16/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30809] (John Carroll Walsh ) [Entered: 01/12/2023 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30809] (Alyssa Riggins ) [Entered: 01/12/2023 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-30809] (Thomas A. Farr ) [Entered: 01/12/2023 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-30809] (Phillip Strach ) [Entered: 01/12/2023 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Reply Brief to Notice of Appeal received from Appellant Mr. Jacques L. Soudelier because the brief is premature as the briefing notice has not issued. Please see the court's notice of 1/5/2023 regarding payment of the filing fee. [22-30809] (WMJ) [Entered: 01/09/2023 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 01/20/2023 for Appellant Jacques L. Soudelier. [22-30809] (SEP) [Entered: 01/05/2023 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jacques L. Soudelier. [22-30809] (SEP) [Entered: 12/27/2022 01:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
