USA v. Romero
| United States of America |
| Jaime Cruz Romero, also known as Panfilo Sacais, also known as Jaime Carrillo, also known as Jaime |
| 22-40014 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Awaiting ruling on motion for appointment of counsel. [22-40014] (CAG) [Entered: 01/12/2022 04:13 PM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Cruz Romero [22-40014] (CAG) [Entered: 01/07/2022 06:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Romero | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Suzanne Englade |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Jaime Cruz Romero, also known as Panfilo Sacais, also known as Jaime Carrillo, also known as Jaime | |
| Represented By: | Jaime Cruz Romero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
