Hall v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Kenneth Dewayne Hall
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 22-40019
Filed: January 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40019] (CMB) [Entered: 03/02/2022 06:37 PM]
February 24, 2022 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/21/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Kenneth Dewayne Hall. Fee due on 03/28/2022 for Appellant Kenneth Dewayne Hall [22-40019] (CAG) [Entered: 02/24/2022 04:01 PM]
February 24, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:18-CV-721. Electronic ROA due on 03/11/2022. [22-40019] (CAG) [Entered: 02/24/2022 04:21 PM]
January 31, 2022 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Kenneth Dewayne Hall to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [22-40019] (DLM) [Entered: 02/03/2022 09:19 AM]
January 31, 2022 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Dewayne Hall in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9769388-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA). Date of Service: 01/26/2022. [9769399-1] [22-40019] (DLM) [Entered: 02/03/2022 09:17 AM]
January 31, 2022 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Dewayne Hall for certificate of appealability [9769388-2]. Date of service: 01/26/2022 [22-40019] (DLM) [Entered: 02/03/2022 09:10 AM]
January 14, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Georgette Dudly Hogarth for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40019] (Georgette Dudly Hogarth ) [Entered: 01/14/2022 10:48 AM]
January 14, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Georgette Dudly Hogarth for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 22-40019 [22-40019] (MRW) [Entered: 01/14/2022 01:53 PM]
January 13, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9755431-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 01/28/2022 for Appellant Kenneth Dewayne Hall [22-40019] (ABT) [Entered: 01/13/2022 04:53 PM]
January 12, 2022 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Dewayne Hall [22-40019] (ABT) [Entered: 01/12/2022 09:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hall v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Kenneth Dewayne Hall
Represented By: Kenneth Dewayne Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Georgette Dudly Hogarth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?