Johnson v. Guiterrez
Billy Rayford Johnson |
David Guiterrez, Angela Nation, John Doe and Jane Doe |
22-40064 |
February 2, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's Brief received from Appellant Mr. Billy Rayford Johnson with pages numbered from 1 to 23, and a separate Memorandum in Support of Appellant's Brief with the page numbering contining with pages 24 to 40, which includes incorporated exhibits on pages 35 to 39 of the document, because a brief on the merits of the appeal is premature at this time. Should the appeal proceed to briefing, the documents would be viewed as a single appellant's brief which would require corrections. [22-40064] (DLM) [Entered: 03/25/2022 12:13 PM] |
FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Billy Rayford Johnson. Fee deadline satisfied [22-40064] (DLM) [Entered: 03/04/2022 10:38 AM] |
LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: Appellant's inquiry asking for instructions on how to get his appeal before this court. The notice of appeal he filed is already before the court. Notice of the docketing of his appeal has crossed in the mail this inquiry. [22-40064] (DLM) [Entered: 02/24/2022 01:30 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9775931-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 04/11/2022 for Appellant Billy Rayford Johnson [22-40064] (SDH) [Entered: 02/14/2022 02:10 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Rayford Johnson [22-40064] (DMS) [Entered: 02/02/2022 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.