Sewell v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Jason Daniel Sewell
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 22-40101
Filed: February 22, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2022 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 05/02/2022 for Appellant Jason Daniel Sewell. Brief in Support due on 05/02/2022 for Appellant Jason Daniel Sewell [22-40101] (DDL) [Entered: 03/22/2022 04:15 PM]
March 22, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40101] (DDL) [Entered: 03/22/2022 04:14 PM]
March 14, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Scott Brown for Appellant Jason Daniel Sewell in 22-40101 [22-40101] (ABT) [Entered: 03/14/2022 09:26 AM]
March 11, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-59. Electronic ROA due on 03/28/2022. [22-40101] (ABT) [Entered: 03/11/2022 10:39 AM]
March 11, 2022 FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Jason Daniel Sewell. Fee deadline satisfied [22-40101] (ABT) [Entered: 03/11/2022 10:36 AM]
March 10, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40101] (Gerald Scott Brown ) [Entered: 03/10/2022 12:56 PM]
February 25, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Patrick Daniel Todd for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 22-40101 [22-40101] (CCR) [Entered: 02/25/2022 03:31 PM]
February 24, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9784242-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 03/11/2022 for Appellant Jason Daniel Sewell [22-40101] (CCR) [Entered: 02/24/2022 10:37 AM]
February 24, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Patrick Daniel Todd for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40101] (Patrick Daniel Todd ) [Entered: 02/24/2022 01:45 PM]
February 22, 2022 CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Jason Daniel Sewell in 22-40101. Update: Appellant has retained counsel. [22-40101] (SDH) [Entered: 02/22/2022 03:15 PM]
February 22, 2022 PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Daniel Sewell [22-40101] (SDH) [Entered: 02/22/2022 03:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sewell v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Jason Daniel Sewell
Represented By: Scott Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Patrick Daniel Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?