Treadway v. Otero
| Sophy Treadway |
| Sopheak Otero, Matthew Otero and Exxizz Foods, Incorporated, doing business as Rockport Donuts |
| Xenos Yuen |
| 22-40403 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process for additional appeal filed August 22, 2022. [9925558-2] [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 08/26/2022 08:00 AM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:19-CV-244. Electronic ROA due on 09/09/2022. [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 08/25/2022 02:34 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process for additional appeal docketed August 22, 2022 for Sophy Treadway and Xenos Yuen. [9925143-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 08/25/2022 02:22 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9923916-2] NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Sophy Treadway and Mr. Xenos Yuen. [9923916-1] [22-40403] (RLL) [Entered: 08/24/2022 12:16 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9922017-2] NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Sophy Treadway and Mr. Xenos Yuen. [9922017-1] [22-40403] (CAG) [Entered: 08/22/2022 02:42 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40403] (CMB) [Entered: 08/16/2022 10:17 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/26/2022 for Appellants Sophy Treadway and Xenos Yuen. [22-40403] (CMB) [Entered: 08/16/2022 10:18 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Xenos Yuen for Appellant Sophy Treadway in 22-40403 [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 08/05/2022 01:05 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:19-CV-244. Electronic ROA due on 08/22/2022. [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 08/05/2022 10:28 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Sophy Treadway advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 08/05/2022 10:28 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Ms. Sophy Treadway [ # 9908893-2 ] [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 08/05/2022 10:20 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Sophy Treadway to reopen case [9908893-2]. Date of service: 08/04/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Barrett, Yuen; Attorney for Appellee: Johnson [22-40403] (Xenos Yuen ) [Entered: 08/04/2022 10:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Xenos Yuen for Ms. Sophy Treadway for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-40403] (Xenos Yuen ) [Entered: 08/04/2022 09:36 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter[9903220-2] [22-40403] (CCR) [Entered: 07/28/2022 04:06 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kenneth Royce Barrett for Appellant Xenos Yuen in 22-40403, Attorney Kenneth Royce Barrett for Appellant Sophy Treadway in 22-40403 [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 07/22/2022 09:52 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Appellant Xenos Yuen added to case. [22-40403] (MAS) [Entered: 07/21/2022 01:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40403] (Kenneth Royce Barrett ) [Entered: 07/20/2022 11:16 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9885856-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 07/21/2022 for Appellant Sophy Treadway [22-40403] (SDH) [Entered: 07/06/2022 10:13 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Sophy Treadway [22-40403] (MAS) [Entered: 06/30/2022 10:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
