Clay v. State Class Dept of TDCJ
Thomas H. Clay |
State Classification Department of TDCJ, Chief of the SCC Transfer Department, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Lanette Linthicum, TDCJ Health Services Medical Director, Ernestine Julye, Medical Facility Director, Paul Reilly, P.A., TDCJ Administrative Employees and Correctional Unit Officers |
22-40507 |
August 5, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/16/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Thomas H. Clay. Fee due on 10/14/2022 for Appellant Thomas H. Clay [22-40507] (ABT) [Entered: 09/29/2022 01:54 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/16/2022 denying motion for relief from judgment [22-40507] (ABT) [Entered: 09/29/2022 01:48 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the "Default Judgment" received from Appellant Mr. Thomas H. Clay which requests the law library give him a lawbook citation, but without identifying what case he is referring to, the name of director of the law library and this court's attorneys office. The 5th Circuit library and clerk's office no longer fulfill request for research, shepardizing of cases, status or forms. The notice of appeal he filed on 8/4/22 has been docketed. [22-40507] (DLM) [Entered: 08/09/2022 04:10 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for motion for relief of judgment. [9911581-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [22-40507] (ABT) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:39 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Thomas H. Clay [22-40507] (CCR) [Entered: 08/05/2022 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.