Gibson Brands v. Armadillo Distr
Gibson Brands, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation |
Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated, a Florida corporation and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C. |
22-40587 |
August 26, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Trademark |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40587] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2022 11:33 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/23/2022 for Appellants/Cross-Appellees Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C.. [22-40587] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2022 11:34 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Christina L. Bickham, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 09/19/2022 Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 09/28/2022 03:49 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-358. Electronic ROA due on 10/13/2022. [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 09/28/2022 03:50 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9940236-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 09/15/2022 11:33 AM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Cross appeal filed. [9938557-2] Parties updated: Appellants/Cross-Appellees Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C., Appellee/Cross-Appellant Gibson Brands, Incorporated in 22-40587. NOA filed by Appellee Gibson Brands, Incorporated. [9938557-1] [22-40587] (RLL) [Entered: 09/13/2022 11:57 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stephen D. Howen for party(s) Appellee Gibson Brands, Incorporated, in case 22-40587 [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:51 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40587] (Stephen D. Howen ) [Entered: 09/09/2022 02:33 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Emileigh S. Hubbard for Appellant Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C. in 22-40587, Attorney Emileigh S. Hubbard for Appellant Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated in 22-40587 [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 09/09/2022 11:51 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Vic Houston Henry for party(s) Appellant Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated Appellant Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C., in case 22-40587 [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 09/09/2022 07:43 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C.. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Christina L. Bickham, Proceeding Type and Date: Hearing 05/13/2022. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 09/19/2022 for Christina Bickham, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9934244-2 ] [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 09/08/2022 08:31 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40587] (Vic Houston Henry ) [Entered: 09/07/2022 01:14 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Emileigh S. Hubbard for Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-40587] (Emileigh S. Hubbard ) [Entered: 09/07/2022 01:18 PM] |
ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C.for the Court to process. Date of service: 09/07/2022 via US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Bates; email - Attorney for Appellee: Bates; Attorney for Appellant: Hubbard. [22-40587] (Emileigh S. Hubbard ) [Entered: 09/07/2022 01:33 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9927652-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/13/2022 for Appellants Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C. [22-40587] (ABT) [Entered: 08/29/2022 04:04 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C. [22-40587] (RLL) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gibson Brands v. Armadillo Distr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: Gibson Brands, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation | |
Represented By: | Andrea Bates |
Represented By: | Stephen D. Howen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated, a Florida corporation | |
Represented By: | Emileigh S. Hubbard |
Represented By: | Vic Houston Henry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C. | |
Represented By: | Emileigh S. Hubbard |
Represented By: | Vic Houston Henry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.